Not getting into the details - simply pointing out this existing 3-page thread for the discussion:
http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=350756
Printable View
Not getting into the details - simply pointing out this existing 3-page thread for the discussion:
http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=350756
More welfare for neo-Bolsheviks
A drug dealer with a gun, who would have thought. :confused:
I sat on a second-degree murder trial, drug deal gone bad. No guns were used - they used a Japanese katana!!!!!
Was it properly sharpened? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Statkowski
The potential issue I see with it is the sharing of information between states, depending on what that information is. Also the part about PSP looking into improving background checks, depending on the "improvements" since they already have a not-registry registry.
It's as legit as this:
Attachment 120504
So let's say Wolf bans "military style assault weapons". If I'm caught at the range with an AR-15 shooting .223 with some boy scouts for their rifle merit badge...I'd think that legally I could prove it's not a military weapon...or an assault weapon, considering neither of those are actually real things.
I have no faith in PA's liberal judges of course, but if done fairly, it's an open-shut case in MY favor.
I don't understand how any State, City or the Feds can "ban" what they are now defining as Assault Rifles. The AR-15 is obviously Common Use, and the Supreme Court ruled individuals could possess them. Why have the courts not struck down state laws that have effectively banned them?Quote:
Originally Posted by alpacaheat
Went through him and stuck in the floor. Lucky us, we got to see the picture.Quote:
Originally Posted by JenniferG