Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
Another one to oppose. $100,000 liability insurance required.
Quote:
Regular Session 2017-2018
Senate Bill 1182
Short Title: An Act amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in firearms and other dangerous articles, providing for liability insurance for firearms.
Prime Sponsor: Senator FARNESE
Last Action: Referred to JUDICIARY, May 31, 2018 [Senate]
Memo: Firearm Insurance Coverage
for details and text see: http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/...type=B&bn=1182
Re: Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Brick
Look at the "poll tax" cases for why this is unconstitutional.
Re: Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GunLawyer001
Look at the "poll tax" cases for why this is unconstitutional.
I hate to disagree with you, but if PA's courts are capable of claiming that the PSP "Gun Sales Database" is not a registry because it doesn't contain all guns, they're capable of claiming this is not a tax since payment is made to a "private entity" to purchase the insurance.
Re: Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
No way. Make non gun owners purchase insurance just like I need to purchase uninsured motorist coverage. My insurance IS my gun.
Re: Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
.
$1000 for every leftist to vote
Re: Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
Quote:
Originally Posted by
middlefinger
.
$1000 for every leftist to vote
Yes and an extra 1000 for illegal beaners!
Re: Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
How much per gun and how do they figure they know how many guns a person owns?
Here's my monies - come and take them.
Re: Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
He's a Philly dem. Enough said.
Re: Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
does the kind of insurance this clown wants even exist???
Re: Gun Owner Liability Insurance SB 1182
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GunLawyer001
Look at the "poll tax" cases for why this is unconstitutional.
I wonder if the sophists who violate USSC precedent with Miller vs US by supporting a ban on "weapons of war" couldn't weasel their way around this one? They're not logical thinkers but they're good narrative jugglers.