Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 101
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    4,066
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Glocks are too dangerous

    This article is from 1992 and I find it to be a fascinating 2-page read. I also wonder what it would look like if written today.

    http://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/31/ny...pposition.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pennsyltucky, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,076
    Rep Power
    21474862

    Default Re: Glocks are too dangerous

    He added that cleaning the Glock can be hazardous because it must be taken apart and the trigger must be pulled. He called that feature unnecessarily dangerous, saying that an officer who neglects to check the firing chamber may find himself shooting off a bullet. "People forget," he said. "People indulge in alcohol. You don't have to be drunk to make a mistake, maybe just have had a few beers."
    Quoted for the win ^^^^^^lol


    My how times have changed.
    A good read and a damn good historical reference point as police departments began militarizing, even though they were unaware where it all was going.
    FUCK BIDEN

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Stone's throw from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Butler County)
    Posts
    6,016
    Rep Power
    21474855

    Default Re: Glocks are too dangerous

    Mr. Chenow of the Chicago Police Department said officials there acknowledged that officers needed greater firepower, but determined that Glocks were too dangerous for innocent civilians, who might be struck by an accidental volley. Glocks have been known to discharge several bullets with only one trigger pull, he said.
    Automatic Glocks? I'm not a Glock fan, but if I could get a full-auto one....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Next to the Corn
    Posts
    3,833
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: Glocks are too dangerous

    It took a LOT to get the NYPD (and other depts with idiots) pistols over the revolvers they had for years. Mostly because of ignorance, stupidity and politics. Then god forbid they adequately train the officers and give them ammo/range time to get proficient with the pistols.

    Doesn't really matter what gun you issue them, a careless idiot with a gun always prevails at doing something stupid.

    Automatic Glocks? I'm not a Glock fan, but if I could get a full-auto one....
    You are not worthy. Only LE departments can get G18s or conversions. Along with certain FFLs with the right permission from the BATFE.

    I sure would like one, it would be fun. Especially with the little skeleton stock they make for them.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    127.0.0.1, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    20,357
    Rep Power
    21474874

    Default Re: Glocks are too dangerous

    Quote Originally Posted by scruff View Post
    Automatic Glocks? I'm not a Glock fan, but if I could get a full-auto one....
    You need one, cause you never know when you'll need it.



    The "flaw" in the Glock design is humans that are too stupid/lazy to check the chamber before dis-assembly? Yup, the first thing I do before I start cleaning my guns is drink a 5th of Tequila.
    Rules are written in the stone,
    Break the rules and you get no bones,
    all you get is ridicule, laughter,
    and a trip to the house of pain.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Middle of PA, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    7,554
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: Glocks are too dangerous

    Quote Originally Posted by dkf View Post
    It took a LOT to get the NYPD (and other depts with idiots) pistols over the revolvers they had for years. Mostly because of ignorance, stupidity and politics. Then god forbid they adequately train the officers and give them ammo/range time to get proficient with the pistols.

    Doesn't really matter what gun you issue them, a careless idiot with a gun always prevails at doing something stupid.



    You are not worthy. Only LE departments can get G18s or conversions. Along with certain FFLs with the right permission from the BATFE.

    I sure would like one, it would be fun. Especially with the little skeleton stock they make for them.

    This explains why a retired NY cop I know HATES my semi-auto pistol and said I should have bought a revolver.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    21
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Glocks are too dangerous

    Quote Originally Posted by free View Post
    This article is from 1992 and I find it to be a fascinating 2-page read. I also wonder what it would look like if written today.

    http://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/31/ny...pposition.html
    It's even more fascinating as a window into a time when U.S. police were concerned about becoming over-militarized.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    3,935
    Rep Power
    339929

    Default Re: Glocks are too dangerous

    Quote Originally Posted by dkf View Post
    You are not worthy. Only LE departments can get G18s or conversions. Along with certain FFLs with the right permission from the BATFE.

    I sure would like one, it would be fun. Especially with the little skeleton stock they make for them.
    Count me in. It's basically a G17 with a happy switch. I can't see me using it as a FA much. But why have a 17 when you can have an 18?

    It does everything a 17 does until you flip a switch. Then it does a little more.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    delco, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Posts
    923
    Rep Power
    3958268

    Default Re: Glocks are too dangerous

    providing Glocks for more than 200 uniformed officers who drive patrol cars for sergeants.
    Why are there officers needed to chauffeur sergeants? They can't drive themselves? Seems a huge waste of money / resources.

    On topic though... I specifically chose my XD over a glock because I wanted more than just the trigger safety. (I know there are other safeties in the gun but I mean the external user operated type).
    Quote Originally Posted by internet troll View Post
    I blame New Jersey for putting itself above the Constitution

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Mohnton, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    7,194
    Rep Power
    21474854

    Default Re: Glocks are too dangerous

    Quote Originally Posted by 90volts View Post
    Why are there officers needed to chauffeur sergeants? They can't drive themselves? Seems a huge waste of money / resources.

    On topic though... I specifically chose my XD over a glock because I wanted more than just the trigger safety. (I know there are other safeties in the gun but I mean the external user operated type).
    Cause of all the booze mentioned earlier. Booze and donuts, yum.

Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Christie is dangerous
    By rompus in forum National
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: July 30th, 2013, 02:09 AM
  2. Which do you think is more dangerous?
    By ViperGTS19801 in forum General
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: March 2nd, 2011, 06:20 PM
  3. Dangerous or not?
    By flasks in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 8th, 2009, 12:39 PM
  4. Dangerous
    By Rick Thorne in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 6th, 2008, 10:18 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •