|
|||||||
| Pennsylvania Discuss Pennsylvania-Specific politics and organize communication with state representatives here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have a question on the gun registery. It is being brought up agaiin with HB760. I know the State law forbids any registry but the State Supreme court ruled that the one the state police have is legal and can stand. If this was ruled legal how can any registry be forbidden. I understand that the government can break the laws and be exempted but how to make them accountable is the question also. Government feels they are wiser than the regular people. They seem to think they live by a different set of rules, do as I say not as I do mentality. They say their decisions on how to spend your money is far superior to ours. In reality how do we get them to listen. Voting them out? Who would replace them? Is there a serious way we can get them to listen.
I am not just saying all of this to spout off. I would really like to see an answer to these questions. Or have we gone down that slippery slope to far to climb back up? Frustrated? You bet I am. But still have a grain of hope. |
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Cf. www.pafoa.org/forum/news-123/4270-house-bill-760-firearms-registration-act-page-7.html#post48423 Last edited by awkx; April 12th, 2007 at 06:42 AM. Reason: clarification |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Daniel Pehrson, Founder & President, Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association Purchase a Forum Subscription • Advertise your Business with PAFOA • Buy some PAFOA Merchandise • Help PAFOA's Search Engine Ranking |
|
||||
|
Im sorry i was talking about i'm ok with the state police registry. that i'm ok with. The new one i'm not.
__________________
|
|
|||
|
If I read the post right the part stating any government does not include the legislation?
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
I never understood the logic of this. Why do they need to retain sales information AFTER the background check has been completed? If the purpose is to ensure that a prohibited person cannot take posession of a firearm, why is it necessary to keep a record of the sale after the LEGAL, NON-CRIMINAL purchaser has taken posession of a firearm? Again, a person goes through a background check, which proves that he is not prohibited from owning a firearm. Firearm is transferred. He has to go through another background check if he buys another firearm anyway, so why then do they keep a record of the sale? How is a record of the make/model/barrel length/etc. relavent in any way to the background check? About 5-6 years ago my apartment was robbed and some guns were stolen. The police took me to the station to go over some information. Within 5 minutes, they had a fax in their office with a list of ALL the firearms I have ever owned, past and present. I was shocked that they could do that so easily! |
|
|||
|
MorganB,
With that same capability they will have their list to know each person who does not comply with the new law should it pass. Its a given that the criminals will not go through the process, about the only thing the law will aid in preventing is the illegal sale to those who are prohibited. The law will not lower gun related crimes, nor will it prevent criminals from stealing firearms from valid owners. The law will also increase the underground business of unregistered firearms. It seems that the higher degree of education some people receive that there is a tremendous loss of common sense. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.
















Linear Mode
