|
|||||||
| Pennsylvania Discuss Pennsylvania-Specific politics and organize communication with state representatives here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
There is a bill in the PA Senate that, if passed, would limit handgun purchases to on per month. It is Senate Bill 1002 and is sponsored by LeAnna Washington, D-4 Philadelphia; Wayne Fontana, D-42, Pittsburgh; Constance Williams D-17, King of Prussia; Anthony Williams, D-8, Philadelphia; and Vincent Hughes D-7, Philadelphia.
A copy of the bill in its current form can be found at: http://www2.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/...SB1002P1340.pdf Fontana was interviewed on WTAE news this evening. The video can be seen at: http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com...473/detail.html Not only does this bill limit handgun purchases but also limits an individuals to selling one handgun per month. S1002 also mandates that a seller of a handgun request a handgun purchase history to make sure that a buyer has not made a purchase during the preceding thirty day period. This provision would create a de facto gun registry. This is exactly the kind of wrong-headed thinking that needs to be voted out of office. Please do your part. |
|
|
|||
|
i better buy up now then...lol
|
|
|||
|
You can kill more people with 2 guns. Definatly.
What a croc. |
|
|||
|
You guys are all writing and calling your reps, right?
__________________
"Freedom is not free" Visit TheRallyPoint.org TheRallyPoint at LRGC- Saturday August 26th - After Action Report ACLJ - kicking the ACLU's butt since 1990 |
|
|||
|
To me...It does'nt matter if you only own one gun in the house....because it can still killl, so what the heck of idea is that allowing to buy only one gun per month ? doesn't make sense, in that case, shooters may start building their own.
|
|
||||
|
Philly wants to set it's own rules so it can do even more. Right now only the state can make the rules. This will allow an exception. Once they have the exception they will have it a lot easier to get more. And other cities and towns will want the same right.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
1. This isn't being introduced just for Philly, it's an amendment to the Consolidated Statutes. This would take effect statewide. Other cities and towns wouldn't have to request it, it would be automatic and forced upon all counties/municipalities regardless of their feelings on the issue. 2. Notice that the bill also mentions an additional "purchase history check" would be required in order to verify that individuals are in compliance. Guess what that means folks - the gun registry would have to stay in place. There's no way for the govt. to perform a history check without it. It almost seems like this is an effort, politically, to defeat HB2536/SB1156. 3. I'm not sure on this one, but does the Uniform Firearms Act (the pre-emption law) specifically disallow purchase limits? If so, this bill would have to amend it, and I see no provision for that in the text. Without such a provision, this bill cannot pass as it would be in conflict with a law already on the books. If the UFC doesn't specifically mention purchase limits, however, then it does have merit. If anyone has information on this, it would be appreciated. Take it FWIW. |
|
||||
|
Here was the response I received when I wrote my state senator, Greenleaf.
Dear Mr. Cole: Senator Greenleaf asked me to respond to your e-mail concerning legislation addressing the sale of handguns. Senator Greenleaf chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee and I serve as his counsel. The Senate Judiciary Committee discussed the legislation but did not vote on it. Instead the committee decided to hold public hearings this summer on the issue of urban violence, including the use of handguns as a part of the violence. Thank you for providing us with your views on this issue. -- Gregg Warner |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.












Linear Mode
