Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association

Go Back   Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association Discussion Forum > Law & Politics > Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Discuss Pennsylvania-Specific politics and organize communication with state representatives here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old May 27th, 2006
TRB TRB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
City/Town/Rural, Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County)
Posts: 438
Rep Power: 15
TRB has much to be proud ofTRB has much to be proud ofTRB has much to be proud ofTRB has much to be proud ofTRB has much to be proud ofTRB has much to be proud ofTRB has much to be proud ofTRB has much to be proud ofTRB has much to be proud of
Default PA one gun per month

There is a bill in the PA Senate that, if passed, would limit handgun purchases to on per month. It is Senate Bill 1002 and is sponsored by LeAnna Washington, D-4 Philadelphia; Wayne Fontana, D-42, Pittsburgh; Constance Williams D-17, King of Prussia; Anthony Williams, D-8, Philadelphia; and Vincent Hughes D-7, Philadelphia.

A copy of the bill in its current form can be found at:

http://www2.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/...SB1002P1340.pdf

Fontana was interviewed on WTAE news this evening. The video can be seen at:

http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com...473/detail.html

Not only does this bill limit handgun purchases but also limits an individuals to selling one handgun per month.

S1002 also mandates that a seller of a handgun request a handgun purchase history to make sure that a buyer has not made a purchase during the preceding thirty day period. This provision would create a de facto gun registry.

This is exactly the kind of wrong-headed thinking that needs to be voted out of office. Please do your part.
Reply With Quote

Thanks for visiting our forum! If you ever plan to return you should consider quickly registering for a forum account, especially if you're in Pennsylvania. It's simple to do and best of all free. Once registered you'll be able to participate in our discussions and keep up to date on issues important to Pennsylvania firearm owners!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old May 27th, 2006
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
West Lawn, Pennsylvania
(Berks County)
Age: 25
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 5
billy870m9 will become famous soon enoughbilly870m9 will become famous soon enough
Default

i better buy up now then...lol
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old May 27th, 2006
aubie515's Avatar
Grand Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Pottstown, Pennsylvania
(Chester County)
Age: 36
Posts: 1,421
Rep Power: 7
aubie515 is a jewel in the roughaubie515 is a jewel in the roughaubie515 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via Yahoo to aubie515
Default

That might not be a bad idea...seeing how I bought 3 last week. If I could only buy one a month...I would save money HAHA...seriously...that bill is a joke...no criminal is going to care how many he/she can steal...Isn't the whole idea behind PICS to prevent criminals from buying firearms legally? I think the bill is total BS, but if it is approved...we will just have to learn to live with it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old May 27th, 2006
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County)
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 4
Spectre6 will become famous soon enough
Default

You can kill more people with 2 guns. Definatly.

What a croc.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old May 28th, 2006
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County)
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 0
9mmMike is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

You guys are all writing and calling your reps, right?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2006
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Coraopolis, Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County)
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 4
deepcharge41 is on a distinguished road
Question The Bill.

To me...It does'nt matter if you only own one gun in the house....because it can still killl, so what the heck of idea is that allowing to buy only one gun per month ? doesn't make sense, in that case, shooters may start building their own.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2006
Siobhra's Avatar
Super Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Spring Mount, Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County)
Age: 62
Posts: 828
Rep Power: 113
Siobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond reputeSiobhra has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Philly wants to set it's own rules so it can do even more. Right now only the state can make the rules. This will allow an exception. Once they have the exception they will have it a lot easier to get more. And other cities and towns will want the same right.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2006
ChamberedRound's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Pennsylvania
(Berks County)
Age: 35
Posts: 4,044
Rep Power: 445
ChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Siobhra
Philly wants to set it's own rules so it can do even more. Right now only the state can make the rules. This will allow an exception. Once they have the exception they will have it a lot easier to get more. And other cities and towns will want the same right.
A few things I noticed about this bill:

1. This isn't being introduced just for Philly, it's an amendment to the Consolidated Statutes. This would take effect statewide. Other cities and towns wouldn't have to request it, it would be automatic and forced upon all counties/municipalities regardless of their feelings on the issue.

2. Notice that the bill also mentions an additional "purchase history check" would be required in order to verify that individuals are in compliance. Guess what that means folks - the gun registry would have to stay in place. There's no way for the govt. to perform a history check without it. It almost seems like this is an effort, politically, to defeat HB2536/SB1156.

3. I'm not sure on this one, but does the Uniform Firearms Act (the pre-emption law) specifically disallow purchase limits? If so, this bill would have to amend it, and I see no provision for that in the text. Without such a provision, this bill cannot pass as it would be in conflict with a law already on the books. If the UFC doesn't specifically mention purchase limits, however, then it does have merit. If anyone has information on this, it would be appreciated.

Take it FWIW.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2006
Cole's Avatar
Super Member
PAFOA Silver Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County)
Posts: 533
Rep Power: 16
Cole has much to be proud ofCole has much to be proud ofCole has much to be proud ofCole has much to be proud ofCole has much to be proud ofCole has much to be proud ofCole has much to be proud ofCole has much to be proud ofCole has much to be proud of
Default

Here was the response I received when I wrote my state senator, Greenleaf.


Dear Mr. Cole: Senator Greenleaf asked me to respond to your e-mail
concerning legislation addressing the sale of handguns. Senator
Greenleaf chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee and I serve as his
counsel. The Senate Judiciary Committee discussed the legislation but
did not vote on it. Instead the committee decided to hold public
hearings this summer on the issue of urban violence, including the use
of handguns as a part of the violence. Thank you for providing us with
your views on this issue. -- Gregg Warner
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old June 30th, 2006
phillyd2's Avatar
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Quakertown, Pennsylvania
(Bucks County)
Posts: 2,635
Rep Power: 270
phillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond reputephillyd2 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Interesting to note that all bill sponsors have a "D" next to their name. Yet some gun owners still consider voting that party.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Marketing Services provided by MergeMedia.