[CLOSED]Municipalities in violation of §6120 (Preemption)[CLOSED]

[Statkowski]

Originally Posted by thundrr1

He really started to get irritated at that point and asked if I was going to go into the parks and violate their regulations.

At the least, my response to that would have been ambiguous at best.

[andrewjs18]

Originally Posted by thundrr1

Thanks,,,,, I will be using that on Tuesday. I'll put it in their face at the Council meeting. Much appreciated.

which town is the violation in? your profile says you're in media so is it there?

[thundrr1]

Post 248 is the one to which I'm referring. And post 252 is another I'm working on.

[andrewjs18]

Originally Posted by thundrr1

Post 248 is the one to which I'm referring. And post 252 is another I'm working on.

when's the next meeting? got a date/time and place? if it's this Tuesday, the 5th, in the PM, I can go.

[gnbrotz]

Because of clutter, this thread has become fairly useless. I'm closing it at least temporarily for clean up, and possibly permanently if a better solution can be determined.

[gnbrotz]

After some thought, it seems that the best way to keep a 'running list' of preemption violations, challenges, and victories, is through means other than a forum thread. More information can be found in the new thread (Municipalities in violation of §6120 (Preemption)), outlining the new methods to track these efforts.