|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
People with lots of experience, and the scars to prove it, are viturally uninimous in thier opinion that even a good law suit is a bad thing to have. The police made a number of mistakes, including, but by no means limited to, detaining people for open carry. The people who were affected have decided to redress the situation with a law suit. That's thier option, and although it was not the only choice it is a legitimate and respectable choice. I precidt they will substantially prevail on the merits of their claims. I also think they will probably spend more than they will recover, but that will nevertheless be worth it to them. It is also more than a theoretical possibility they will lose. It is very, very difficult to recover against police officers in a jury trial under civil rights or common law tort theories of recovery. In the meantime, all the ranting from the peanut gallery about police losing their jobs and the Township going broke and so forth is appearing in the public media, and detracting from the dignity of what the plaintiffs are trying to do. It certainly is not helping anything. So, for you guys who have never been willing to so much as inconvenience yourself, let alone take on a real fight ("From around my dead, cold hands - asterisk - so long as I don't have to spend any money, miss any work or risk getting on any lists"), and are now enjoying some kind of vicarious power trip, here's an idea: STFU. You are making fools of yourselves. |
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
BTW, these lawsuits will never go to trial, and the City will settle and pay and probably agree to an injunction against doing this crap in the future, and I doubt any of the Plaintiffs are on the hook for attoreys' fees - the police misconduct was so egregious that the case was ripe for a contingency arrangement. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
As for the outcome, time will tell. None of which has anything to do with the point of my post. Edited to add: I missed the part about choosing to cave in and being silly when I originally responded. You obviously know nothing about me. I have been called a lot of things, but not silly. I'm as serious as a heart attack. I have, for example, represented dozens of people in gun rights cases (some of which were without fee, and all of which were at a reduced fee). I have personally been deliberately arrested TWICE in the past four years in order to resist unconstitutional restrictions on the possession or transportation of firearms (in both cases I was vindicated). I am, at present, suing the City of Pittsburgh for thier illegal use of the zoning code to force FFL's out of the City. And those are just the gun-related issues with respect to which I have put my time, my money and my a** on the line. And you? Last edited by PeteG; July 16th, 2008 at 10:58 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
however, in those people's defense, i have to say i do sort of understand where they are coming from. we are supposed to live in a society where the government is answerable to the people and where we have certain rights which are not to be violated by the government. in reality, though...and you actually summed it up very nicely...if a government agent (such as a police officer) crosses the line and violates your rights, there is often little, if anything, you can do about it. people who do not have the money or time to fight a long, drawn-out battle (possibly with little chance of actually having much effect even if they win) just kinda have to roll over and accept their rights being violated. that is not the way it should be and, for some people, the fact that it is that way is extremely frustrating. thus, when someone does actually step up to fight such rights violations, that frustration can come through in the expressions of support for that person. i don't think it's so much about a vicarious power trip as it is about "finally, someone is standing up for what is right...perhaps justice will finally be done in at least this one case". i'm not making excuses for immature comments or people going overboard with it, but i do think that helps to explain it a bit. just my 2 cents. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Recall Andrew Jackson's forced removal of indigenous tribes, particularly the Cherokee's "Trail of Tears". And how did Jackson respond to the SCOTUS ruling in 1831 that it was illegal? By proclaiming that "[Justice] John Marshall has made his decision; let him enforce it now if he can". And this from a President who would be regarded as a hero by contemporary conservatives given his opposition to a central banking system. It's the same age old problems of ego, unethical practices and ulterior (selfish) motives. The only thing that changes over the years are the tyrants names and faces.
__________________
Tony 412.310.7838 http://www.fireinstitute.org "... there's trained and untrained" (Denzel Washington -- Man on Fire) |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I couldn't help but laugh at first. Funny thing is that, technically, I did not get to eat but a literal couple bites of my dinner I paid for... For me it's not a big deal. Not the first meal I've missed a paid for meal due to something coming up or another priority... Nope, the problem was not that I didn't get to eat my meal. It was a LOT bigger than that. The real problem is that in the above quoted post you presume to know what we went through. You then intentionally marginalize what we went through. What a down right crappy thing to do ![]() No Dave, it was definitely not just a few bites of food. In reality we were abused by out of control public servants. We were removed from our friends and families for nothing We were talked down to. We were insulted. We were publicly detained and searched. We were made a negative and public spectacle of due to the ignorance of some public servants. We were forced to then decide to sit back and ignore the abuse and thereby be partially responsible for any further abuses by this police department or go through the toils of trying to hold these "officers" accountable for their actions. Public abuse, time, and money to name a few. I was physically ill for the first three days due to lack of sleep. And you dare marginalize the abuse of citizens by trusted citizen peace officers. I'm very disturbed by that. Let me tell you something else, Dave. My six year old son has been in fear of the police ever since. Despite several conversations explaining the problem and that the police are not the bad guys. He has had several melt downs upon seeing police while out and about since 5/9... Just Monday night, I took him to get ice cream, for a promised reward. As we sat at the picnic table outside the ice cream stand, two TWP police cars rounded the corner. The TWP building is across the street from the ice cream stand. My boy pointed and yelled "police". I said that's OK, they're just going to their office. There he sat, unable to hold in the tears, despite my assurance that the police were not coming to arrest daddy. Unable to finish his ice cream. What should have been a happy reward turned into a very shitty outing. So you go ahead and marginalize the abuses of your fellow officers. I really don't think I expect any different from you, seriously, I don't. I'm damn well going to "proceed with the case", because I know it makes me better than them. Regardless what that makes me to be in your biased eyes.
__________________
To Meleanie: We love you, we miss you and most of all we thank you. Thank you for being you. A strong woman who stood up for what she believed in and in the process brought so many of us together even closer. We will use what we learned from you in continuing to contribute to the cause. Farewell my friend. http://forum.pafoa.org/news-123/7491...d-tonight.html |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Nothing in the above message constitutes Legal Advice. Material is provided for informational/entertainment or other purposes and is not intended to constitute or be relied upon as Legal Advice, nor is it tailored to any specific factual situation. This is not an offer to form an attorney-client relationship. This is not advertising, nor intended to be such. I am not a member of the Pennsylvania State Bar; and while I am an attorney, I am NOT YOUR attorney. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I find it ridiculous that there's people that think these officers should be let off the hook with no repercussions. Not only that, but judging by Dave's comment, it seems he would also prefer they get a commendation for their actions. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The point of my post is that some people here are ecstatic with the level of vigilantism in this post. Some here would like nothing more to grab a rope and hang the police. Why haven't you or any other moderator addressed those posts if justice is such a high priority? I'm sorry anyone has to suffer because of the events of that evening and I make no apology for the unjust actions of the DC police. I'm equally appalled at the blood lust and mob mentality of a minority few here. This atmosphere is not helping anyone.
__________________
"Having a gun and thinking you are armed is like having a piano and thinking you are a musician" Col. Jeff Cooper (U.S.M.C. Ret.) Speed is fine, Accuracy is final |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FYI - I will be OC;ing in Old Country Buffet by 10:45am this morning and...... | Gary in Pennsylvania | Concealed & Open Carry | 6 | April 21st, 2008 11:34 PM |
| open carry @the old country buffet | jahwarrior72 | Open Carry | 22 | April 11th, 2008 11:15 AM |
| Gander Mountain - Dickson City | VeryPrivate | Shops | 13 | January 2nd, 2008 11:37 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.















Linear Mode

