|
|||||||
| News The news important and relevant to Pennsylvania Firearm Owners. Submit your headlines today! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Guys, I'm really surprised that this case isn't getting more attention. This is huge.
If the court takes the case it will be the first time in 70 years a 2nd amendment case has been heard. The last one in 1939... The case revolves around the Appeals Court (not sure of the number, but it handles DC) heard an appeal by law abiding citizens who broke the law by having firearms in the city. One is a cop (retired???). They lost the case in the local courts. They appealed to the federal courts and won. Now the city is going to petition the Supreme Court. One way or another this will have nationwide ramifications. More info in the link: "The District of Columbia has too many handguns," Fenty said. "Putting more handguns, even quote-unquote legal ones, into the quote-unquote law-abiding citizens could get into the hands of people who are going to use them in the commission of crimes."
__________________
Hunting: More than just buying a license. Get involved! |
|
|
||||
|
I doubt SCOTUS will hear the case. They would not see any precedent that needed to be established. The Appeals court prohibited an outright ban on handgun gun ownership. A Federal Court in CA did the same thing to San Francisco's handgun law last year. I suspect they will pass and let the appeals court decision stand.
|
|
||||
|
lets not get too happy ppl
Last few gun cases that came in front of the court they did NOT have the second amendment as an individual right.... if stare decisis rears its ugly head the DC ban might just become a NATIONAL ban. and yes I am paranoid tyvm. |
|
||||
|
People, like myself, in Philadelphia really need to pay attention to this, as this could lay the floorplan for the anti's here to do what they already want to do!!!
__________________
JUSTITIA ET VIRTUS |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Farewell, SFN. Rest in peace. :( |
|
||||
|
Thats exactly what I believe is going to happen. They'll look at the previous ruling and deny the request. SCOTUS has been taking fewer cases over the years and i doubt they'll waste time on something that has already been ruled upon.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
i have a conceal carry permit in Philadelphia and I'm following this case very closely. the Philly politicians would love to get control of the states gun laws and really stick it to the law bidding gun owners in this city
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Man Shoots Teen Robber, Self Defense?
|
What if there was a gunman on campus? Berks colleges, police prepare
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Winchester supreme platinum tip ammo | RUDY850 | Ammunition & Reloading | 5 | August 6th, 2007 06:46 PM |
| Candidates for PA Supreme Court | awkx | Pennsylvania | 5 | May 13th, 2007 11:47 PM |
| Court house carry | God's Country | Concealed & Open Carry | 10 | May 3rd, 2007 06:26 PM |
| Can Aggressive Ammo Hurt you in court?? | Mtbkski | Ammunition & Reloading | 63 | April 20th, 2007 10:08 AM |
| Finding Court Decisions | Brick | General | 4 | February 10th, 2007 02:30 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.
















Linear Mode

