McCain's VP: Gov. Palin is chosen

[adymond]

Originally Posted by P89

What did you 300 of?...acid trips?

Google it like everyone else does...should keep you occupied for awhile.

No no no! He only hates those of us sheep that don't believe everything we read who think Palin brings something valid to the table because it is what we are fed. You know all of us who can not have a free thought. But don't forget to read the leftwing blogs and then try to position yourself as a liberterian because it is easier to troll if you pretend to be similar to those you are trolling. If he just came out and said "Hey, I'm a liberal and don't want Palin to win." We would not argue with hem. We would say welcome to the forum and we will agree to disagree. How does one go about setting up an ignore user setting (not ment for you p89)?

Originally Posted by J8300

There is a lot more than that which ties her to Ted Stevens.

This is funny. Goes against every prediction made here about Palin as choice by McCain by conservatives.

Poll: Obama/Biden Take Eight-Point Lead

CBS News started polling the evening after McCain named Sarah Palin as his running mate.

Obama's lead among women has also grown to 14 points (50 percent to 36 percent)

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/...n4405106.shtml

Okay so what the hell do poll results have to do with her ties to Ted Stevens? Oh okay you don't need proof. That's for the sheep. They are the ones that need to see facts about which they make informed decisions. Thanks for clearing this up for me. Okay so she is a republican and so is Ted Stevens. They are both from Alaska. They have both spent time in Washington (forget that Palin's time there is only for national meetings of governers). They worked with the same lobbyist group in Alaska (how the hell many lobyist groups are ther in Alaska?). Umm . . . let's see I am sure we can come up with more. They are both married. Both have kids. OH MY GOD! She MUST be corrupt just like he is under investigation of being. I mean he is guilty of being. We don't need trials and investigations. If they are accused of it they must be guilty.

Now the second point. What has the bump been from previous conventions? Sorry, but an 8 point lead doesn't exactly scream "landslide" victory to me. I mean isn't this entire country behind the liberal media? Lisetning to them I didn't know there was even going to be an election. I thought the good Lord himself came down and annointed the Holy One. I thought we were going to have a corination ceremony.

[Pa. Patriot]

OMG! I have been reading these "theories" and imaginary controversy surrounding Palin.

All I can say is it is that it is almost unbelievable the lengths to which the desperate "left" will go to. I say almost because we are used to this kind of lunacy being pushed to the front of "real" issues and news.

To think that they actually believe this stuff is hilarious.

[625]

How does one go about setting up an ignore user setting

It's far easier to ignore the tools here by not wasting much time on them. Using the ignore feature only makes the "ignorer" look foolish since they can't respond to dopey statements that they can't see. It's best to keep responses brief and to the point.

All I can say is it is that it is almost unbelievable the lengths to which the desperate "left" will go to. I say almost because we are used to this kind of lunacy being pushed to the front of "real" issues and news.

I say step out of the way and let them shoot themselves in the foot.

[ChamberedRound]

Originally Posted by Pa. Patriot

OMG! I have been reading these "theories" and imaginary controversy surrounding Palin.

All I can say is it is that it is almost unbelievable the lengths to which the desperate "left" will go to. I say almost because we are used to this kind of lunacy being pushed to the front of "real" issues and news.

To think that they actually believe this stuff is hilarious.

Agreed, but the problem is that they're putting it "out there". It doesn't have to be true, it doesn't even have to be credible. It's not about truth, it's about perception. And the more crap that gets spewed, the more likely the sheeple are to perceive it to be true, even if it isn't. That the MSM outlets are even mentioning that this swill is being circulated around the blogs is in and of itself contributing to the perception that it's true by giving it credence.

The sad part is that we're watching the long-standing tradition of the media "keeping the kids out of the politics" dissolve before our eyes simply because it's sensationalist and gets ratings, i.e. money.

[625]

It's not about truth, it's about perception. And the more crap that gets spewed, the more likely the sheeple are to perceive it to be true, even if it isn't

Maybe, but it's easy for the Dems to go over the top and appear "mean spirited" After all, she is just a defenseless little girl.

[adymond]

Originally Posted by 625

Maybe, but it's easy for the Dems to go over the top and appear "mean spirited" After all, she is just a defenseless little girl.

God forbid anyone on the right bring up Obama trotting his kids out on an interview and asking if that was a wise decision since kids have been off limits historically. But attack away at a conservative's kid.

[ChamberedRound]

Originally Posted by 625

Maybe, but it's easy for the Dems to go over the top and appear "mean spirited" After all, she is just a defenseless little girl.

Good point, although I haven't seen that line crossed yet. And given that the kids are supposed to off limits anyway, we shouldn't even see that line challenged.

[ALS]

Kirstin Powers a Democrat contributor and Fox analyst is on the war path on Sean Hannity's Radio show. I have watched her on Fox and she really is good. Hell I wish she would replace Alan Colmes. At least she puts across the Democrat platform much better than I'm a F-ing idiot and have to make crap up Colmes. Plus she is real hottie that I would jump in a minute. But to get the point I told you guys the democrats better be careful on attacking Sarah Palin.

Kirstin is totally pissed off as a Democrat women on how the left wing media and blogs have been attacking Sarah and her family over the weekend. She was saying many of HER female democrat friends are furious as women on these attacks. She said they are not attacking Sarah on her Republican beliefs but on the fact that she is a women. This sexism by the male dominate media is going to back fire in their faces said Kirstin Powers.

[J8300]

Originally Posted by adymond

Okay so what the hell do poll results have to do with her ties to Ted Stevens?

Nothing. Thats why I started a separate paragraph.

If you want to know her connections to Stevens "google it like everyone else."

Now the second point. What has the bump been from previous conventions? Sorry, but an 8 point lead doesn't exactly scream "landslide" victory to me. I mean isn't this entire country behind the liberal media? Lisetning to them I didn't know there was even going to be an election. I thought the good Lord himself came down and annointed the Holy One. I thought we were going to have a corination ceremony.

The funny part was the bump from women, which is the opposite of what some here predicted. Maybe it was just because of his speech, but it was after Palin was announced as the running mate.

[J8300]

this kind of lunacy

Perhaps you missed the thread in the lounge which explains quite clearly who the lunatics really are?

To think that they actually believe this stuff is hilarious.

lol, coming from a xtian this is entirely too funny