New AWB introduced

[Damage control]

Originally Posted by jh664322

My law skills are off, does this mean one could not possess an aw after this bill went into law if said rifle was owned beforehand legally?

Also, does this mean one could not sell an already existent aw to another legal person?

From what I read yes IANAL.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON MANUFACTURE, TRANSFER, AND POSSESSION OF CERTAIN SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.

(a) RESTRICTION- Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding after subsection (u) the following:

`(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.

Good thing I only own defense weapons!

DC

[Jackal]

Originally Posted by Damage control

IANAL.

je ne comprends pas???

[CrazyWhiteGuy]

Originally Posted by jh664322

je ne comprends pas???

I Am Not A Lawyer

What is with the French???

[Pector55]

`(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

^^^^^Don't forget this line^^^^^


Does anyone else see the irony in these bills? Every time they pop up, a lot of people who have been putting off the purchase of an AK or AR, seem to step up their purchases of these firearms in order to get one or 5 or 10 before they can't. This creates a big marketing tool for manufacturers and retailers and people stock up. I wonder how many firearms were purchased due to this vs what would have been purchased if we were never worried about losing our right to do so? I would venture to guess that it would be at least 5 times more.

[JoeWilliams]

Originally Posted by Pector55

`(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

^^^^^Don't forget this line^^^^^


Does anyone else see the irony in these bills? Every time they pop up, a lot of people who have been putting off the purchase of an AK or AR, seem to step up their purchases of these firearms in order to get one or 5 or 10 before they can't. This creates a big marketing tool for manufacturers and retailers and people stock up. I wonder how many firearms were purchased due to this vs what would have been purchased if we were never worried about losing our right to do so? I would venture to guess that it would be at least 5 times more.

AK and AR?

Hunters and others who hate EBRs had best step up and take notice. There's an awful lot of lever action and bolt action hunting guns on that list at the end.

[Shawn.L]

Originally Posted by Pector55

`(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

^^^^^Don't forget this line^^^^^


Does anyone else see the irony in these bills? Every time they pop up, a lot of people who have been putting off the purchase of an AK or AR, seem to step up their purchases of these firearms in order to get one or 5 or 10 before they can't. This creates a big marketing tool for manufacturers and retailers and people stock up. I wonder how many firearms were purchased due to this vs what would have been purchased if we were never worried about losing our right to do so? I would venture to guess that it would be at least 5 times more.

[Shawn.L]

Originally Posted by JoeWilliams

AK and AR?

Hunters and others who hate EBRs had best step up and take notice. There's an awful lot of lever action and bolt action hunting guns on that list at the end.

thats a list of exempted guns that will not be affected, listed so that those hunters know they are safe, and do not need to act.

divide and conquer

[shooter357]

Originally Posted by Pector55

`(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

^^^^^Don't forget this line^^^^^


Does anyone else see the irony in these bills? Every time they pop up, a lot of people who have been putting off the purchase of an AK or AR, seem to step up their purchases of these firearms in order to get one or 5 or 10 before they can't. This creates a big marketing tool for manufacturers and retailers and people stock up. I wonder how many firearms were purchased due to this vs what would have been purchased if we were never worried about losing our right to do so? I would venture to guess that it would be at least 5 times more.

I'm more worried about the election than this bill being passed.

Didn't the previous ban kinda fail miserably? Why would they want to do it again, especialy knowing that it cost so many Dems their seats?

[Jackal]

Originally Posted by CrazyWhiteGuy

I Am Not A Lawyer

What is with the French???

Saying "I don't get it." would have been boring, and I don't want to speak spanish here either....I am not too worried about getting culturally conquered by the french. I already see the latter happening.


I think so called "republicans" have been more liberal lately, minus Paul and a few other drop outs.

[CrazyWhiteGuy]

Originally Posted by jh664322

Saying "I don't get it." would have been boring, and I don't want to speak spanish here either....I am not too worried about getting culturally conquered by the french. I already see the latter happening.


I think so called "republicans" have been more liberal lately, minus Paul and a few other drop outs.

well I grew up with the cubans down in Miami, FL and know that they don't like the cold that much, so I think we are safe up here for now...