|
|||||||
| General General firearm-related talk that does not fit into any of the other forums. |
| PAFOA Sponsors Businesses that provide financial and technical support to PAFOA. | PAFOA Shopping Partners A percentage of all sales made through these partner links goes to PAFOA. | |||
|
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
August 26th, 2007
|
||||
|
||||
Re: AK-47 Manufacturers
Milled, stamped...........Does anyone know of a stamped receiver falling apart or otherwise shitting the bed????? Ever?????? Other than feeling more sturdy, is there really an advantage that is worth the extra money?
Jules 
|
|
|
August 26th, 2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: AK-47 Manufacturers
The earliest stamped Type 1 receivers did fall apart and didn't hold up too well but I'm pretty sure that is nonexistant with the modernized stamped receivers.
People say that accuracy is improved from a milled receiver, but not a significant enough improvement to justify the extra hundred and change. Strictly for collecting purposes though, I would like to own a milled Arsenal one day.
|
|
September 2nd, 2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: AK-47 Manufacturers
I bought a Century built Yugoslavian underfolder this spring from my local Dunhams. It cost me $450. It shoots minute of bad guy all day long. It's way too much fun to shoot. It wasn't designed to be a sniper rifle. Nothing wrong with the plastic, but I still want to change to wood foregrips. Nice thing is with the Yugo magazines, is that they hold the bolt open on an empty mag.
 Check these guys before you buy. http://www.centerfiresystems.com/
__________________
"Having a gun and thinking you are armed is like having a piano and thinking you are a musician" Col. Jeff Cooper (U.S.M.C. Ret.) Speed is fine, Accuracy is final 
Last edited by DaveM55; September 2nd, 2007 at 01:15 PM.
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.