|
|||||||
| General General firearm-related talk that does not fit into any of the other forums. |
| PAFOA Sponsors Businesses that provide financial and technical support to PAFOA. | PAFOA Shopping Partners A percentage of all sales made through these partner links goes to PAFOA. | |||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
||||
|
§ 5503. Disorderly conduct.
(a) Offense defined.--A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: 1. Engages in fighting or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; 2. Makes unreasonable noise; 3. Uses obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture; or 4. Creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor. ============================================= I don't really have any advice. But I think the type that blocks a road and then gets irrational about it when you call them on it are not likely to press chgs. Your details are a bit sketchy. But it sounds like you should have broken off the contact once it turned into an argument. Then YOU could have called the police to report the person willfully blocking a public street. If they are blocking a road, and you tell them and they want to argue about it let them argue with the police. |
|
||||
|
thanks, didnt even think of looking up the definition. But that helps me, I can easily get them with it too then if it comes to that.
What I've been looking for and cant find is what can actually happen to me, like how much I could be fined or whatever. Also not sure, but how can a person file under this? WAIT a second lol. Key words there "with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he:" I had no intent to do that, i was trying to remove a public inconvenience
__________________
Last edited by Skuggi; August 3rd, 2007 at 11:10 PM. |
|
||||
|
§ 5503. Disorderly conduct.
(a) Offense defined.--A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: engages in fighting or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; makes unreasonable noise; uses obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture; or creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor. (b) Grading.--An offense under this section is a misdemeanor of the third degree if the intent of the actor is to cause substantial harm or serious inconvenience, or if he persists in disorderly conduct after reasonable warning or request to desist. Otherwise disorderly conduct is a summary offense. (c) Definition.--As used in this section the word "public" means affecting or likely to affect persons in a place to which the public or a substantial group has access; among the places included are highways, transport facilities, schools, prisons, apartment houses, places of business or amusement, any neighborhood, or any premises which are open to the public. |
|
||||
|
I'm confused? They wanted to charge you? Did the cop charge you? No matter what, disorderly conduct is irrelevant since you or they didn't commit it.
|
|
||||
|
The officer did nothing at all. He said he was going to tell them they can file it at the magistrate's office if they want.
__________________
|
|
||||
|
The officer told them to go and see the magistrate because he didn't witness anything. If they want to press charges it will end up being their word against yours. I've never, ever heard of anyone following through with this.
If the officer pulls up and everyone is yelling back and forth at one another in the middle of the street or in public so that other persons in the neighborhood can hear or see you, then you could get hit with the (a)(1) charge. Usually the officer will first tell everyone to shut up and back away from each other. Continue to yell, scream or ague and your on the way to getting hit with DC. Did the officer at least get them to move their vehicle? |
|
||||
|
no they had already moved it, after the wife called the cops they literally threw stuff out of it, thats when I got the idea to take that picture. I'm only worried a little I guess about the possibility of having anything on my record
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Skuggi...were you open carrying at the time?
Just curious... |
|
||||
|
You should be safe from charges...I recently took our neighbors to the magistrate for disorderly conduct and lost! Even after we had photographic evidence of them blocking my vehicles in on the street, cigarette butts in our yard, urinating on our house from their 3rd story window...(yeah, real nice people!) We still lost the case. We even filed on behalf of the local PD department who sent 2 officers to the hearing with us!
To finish the story, a few weeks ago, their house mysteriously caught fire and the landlord kicked them out! The fire is still under investigation for arson. Theres alot more to this story, maybe I'll post about it one day...but right now, I am just glad those bastards are gone! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Right Argument in Support of the Second Amendment | NineseveN | General | 71 | December 16th, 2010 02:01 PM |
| What happens when your neighbors are anti-gun??? | ursavus.elemensis | General | 11 | June 24th, 2007 08:13 PM |
| The weak "NEED" argument | RandomTask | General | 10 | March 22nd, 2007 11:03 AM |
| Hello Berks!! and Neighbors | 762xIan | Berks | 22 | January 19th, 2007 07:35 PM |
| Iran ready to share nuclear technology with neighbors | LorDiego01 | General | 4 | December 16th, 2006 04:07 PM |














Linear Mode

