Quote:
Originally Posted by buster2209
Haha, i know what you mean!
Can you imagine the founding fathers, after 8 years of war, the British are finally defeated and the King recognises the independence of the former British Colony. The founding fathers are debating back and forth over how to create a government by the people and for the people and the anti-federalists are worried that this new Federal Government will just be as tyrannical as the British Government. So Madison, and Jefferson and the other anti-federalists work tirelessly to get the bill of rights attached to the constitution and one of there concerns is that people don't have there guns taken away so they can hunt! It's bloody preposterous!!
|
It's much more fundamental than that. I'm talking about winning against the anti gun movement at the ballot box and by extension the courts and even more so as a culture at large. We are about 60 years behind and have only had the last 5-10 catching up to the fact that we sat our on butts with this absurd "guns are for hunting" attitude making ourselves politically irrelevant and barely above being culturally extinct. The other side has been on offense the entire time and it was MAYBE by '93 or so we even woke up and realized we had a fight on our hands.
This is not a "Whoops, oh man, I'm sorry, lemme clean that up" situation, this is an "Oh crap, we'd better swerve out of the wrong side of traffic because that's 10 ton dump truck" situation.
The problem is, and the Californians have become aware of this and have corrected it and now they're gaining ground, that the hunting segment of the population relative to the total population is shrinking and thus relying on them to carry the gun rights cause is STUPID BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO LOSE. Why? Identity politics. Simply put 50-70% of the population in a fairly large number of states isn't in a place where hunting is practical for them nor do the people of such areas identify with what they envision a hunter or firearms owner to be. Hence they hold at very least no loyalty to gun rights and can easily be tilted towards being averse to it. They don't see themselves being interested in an expensive, inconvenient, unfamiliar, impractical, and dangerous hobby which they have lots of very bad information and little if any good. There's nothing in that for them to like. The George Washington stuff isn't going to impress them either--who cares about what some dead dude said 200 years ago in language they barely recognize with ideas and values they don't see as relevant. Of course they're wrong, but meanwhile these people are making laws with or without us that we're stuck with no matter what, so beating this problem is job #1.
So it's either ditch the camo and old white guys with beards and deer guns image and start talking LCTF's for sorority girls and your Indian and Chinese neighbors or it's bye bye 2nd Amendment for everyone.