Ammunition Accountability Act

[larrymeyer]

Another e-mail I received today



From: xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Ammunition Accountability Act
To: xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, December 11, 2008, 9:42 AM



Ammunition Accountability Act



NOT SURE IF THIS IS UP FOR VOTING IN ALABAMA, DON'T KNOW WHICH STATE
SENATORS SPONSORED THIS, IF ANY, BUT IT BEARS WATCHING.

We need to get the word out.

Gun owners had better TAKE ACTION on this one or you (we) are done for.


Ammunition Accountability Act



Heads up to all of you who swore to defend the Constitution of the
United States against all enemies, foreign AND domestic.
Let your state Legislatures know that we do not want this bill passed,
and petition them to vote no on this bill. We should keep after them
until the bill is closed by bombarding them with e-mails, phone calls,
and letters.

Get to all your politicians to get to work and NOT LET THIS HAPPEN!!!
The 2008 Legislative session has begun, and the Ammunition
Accountability Act is being introduced across the country. Below is a
list of states where legislation has already been introduced:
Alabama, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana,
Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington.

http://ammunitionaccountability.org/Legislation.htm
Remember how Obama said that he wasn't going to take your guns? Well, it
seems that his minions and allies in the anti-gun world have no problem
with taking your ammo!

The bill that is being pushed in 18 states (including Illinois and
Indiana ) requires all ammunition to be encoded by the manufacture, a
data base of all ammunition sales. So they will know how much you buy
and what calibers. Nobody can sell any ammunition after June 30, 2009
unless the ammunition is coded.

Any privately held un-coded ammunition must be destroyed by July 1,
2011. (Including, hand loaded ammo.) They will also charge a .05 cent
tax on every round so every box of ammo you buy will go up at least
$2.50 or more! If they can deprive you of ammo they do not need to take
your gun! Please give this the widest distribution possible and contact
your Reps!

[Gary in Pennsylvania]

TAKE THAT SENDERS E-MAIL OUT OF YOUR POST ASAP!!!!!!!!!!


I just PM'd you why.

[Frenchy]

Originally Posted by Gary in Pennsylvania

TAKE THAT SENDERS E-MAIL OUT OF YOUR POST ASAP!!!!!!!!!!


I just PM'd you why.

Chances are, the bottom of that original e-mail said some thing to the effect of:

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender or send back to returns @ somemilitarugroup.org and delete the material from any computer.

Note, to redistribute an email like that is one of the best way to get the original sender in lots of trouble, Please take the time and get the person's name and e-mail out of there ASAP.

[Kenshin]

Originally Posted by Frenchy

Note, to redistribute an email like that is one of the best way to get the original sender in lots of trouble, Please take the time and get the person's name and e-mail out of there ASAP.

This kind of stuff semi cracks me up. Once you put something on the internet its there forever. If you don't want to get in trouble or don't want it seen or anything else don't put it up. (Or on a computer connected to the internet ever.) This being my thoughts on the original sender and that stupid statement about how it shouldn't be redistributed.

[justsayno]

hmmmmm lets seee, take the bullet out of the case, file the end some, and wallllahhh. No coding left... still shoots out of the barrell... and kills gangs or dealers from another area.. This is the criminals senerio... they are smart enough to do this...
this coding is a waste of time...

[larrymeyer]

Originally Posted by Frenchy

Chances are, the bottom of that original e-mail said some thing to the effect of:



Note, to redistribute an email like that is one of the best way to get the original sender in lots of trouble, Please take the time and get the person's name and e-mail out of there ASAP.

Sorry Frenchy no disclaimer on the e-mail at all

[Frenchy]

Originally Posted by Kenshin

This kind of stuff semi cracks me up. Once you put something on the internet its there forever. If you don't want to get in trouble or don't want it seen or anything else don't put it up. (Or on a computer connected to the internet ever.) This being my thoughts on the original sender and that stupid statement about how it shouldn't be redistributed.

PSST. it was an E-mail, not an internet posting, a letter sent to one person, then to the next.

LM, maybe some one snipped the disclaimer, but generally .gov and .mil always have them, heck most companies have them now

[D-FENS]

I'm not sure why people think disclaimers on emails hold any weight. A lot of my customers ask me to set them up for them and it's pointless. The only way it would hold weight is if acknowledging and accepting the disclaimer were a prerequisite to receiving the email. There's no case law/precedent that gives these any legitimacy what-so-ever.

They tend to be used by self-important and oft-irresponsible persons to project responsibility for their carelessness onto 3rd parties.

ETA:
It's no different than shitting into a toilet and having a disclaimer appear at the bottom of the bowl after you've flushed telling you not that corn and peanuts aren't permissible in this toilet.

[Mr. Rodgers]

Does PA have a BILL for doing this? I see PA listed but I can't open the file for some reason. Just say no!

http://www.ammunitionaccountability....slation.htm#PA

[billamj]

Originally Posted by Mr. Rodgers

Does PA have a BILL for doing this? I see PA listed but I can't open the file for some reason. Just say no!

http://www.ammunitionaccountability....slation.htm#PA

Pa. DID have a bill for this in the house during the last session. As I have pointed out multiple times that bill died at the end of the last session because it had not been moved out of committee and the House and Senate never voted on it. There are way too many of these emails and threads around that are only good for raising people's blood pressure. If a bill is not approved by both houses by the end of the session then it dies and it would have to be reintroduced in the new session before it could be acted upon. That is the bottom line.