|
|||||||
| General General firearm-related talk that does not fit into any of the other forums. |
| PAFOA Sponsors Businesses that provide financial and technical support to PAFOA. | PAFOA Shopping Partners A percentage of all sales made through these partner links goes to PAFOA. | |||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
||||
|
I really dont know too much about the history of the PA licensing.
I do know that back in the '70s dad's Jefferson County permits/licenses had his guns' make/model/SN on the back and that mom used to go pick it up for dad because pops worked on the road and was only home a couple weekends a month. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Al |
|
||||
|
Quote:
ie: The sheriff (I assume) can check with the local police to see if there is any record of calls to your home, but is choosing to have the police do the check for that themself. If they find that the police are out at your home a couple nights a week, every week, at 2am because you're completely wasted and screaming, yelling, being belligerent, etc but its never resulted in charges being pressed he may deny based on the 'character' clause using that as evidence of your character and reputation. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
I suspect PA's(along with most other states) probably followed a similiar history,as PA and WV got shall issue in the late 1980's. |
|
||||
|
My understanding is that in 1986(?) there was a state supreme court ruling that held most of the gun laws in PA unconstitutional under the state constitution. The Brady crowd lost all political leverage, and the NRA brokered a deal creating the current LTCF. The deal apparently upset some who simply wanted to keep the status quo, after the court case, which in effect would have been what Vermont has, no shall issue permit, but also no law against CCW.
Prior to the court case, PA had laws which I believe were close to NY or CA, in that it was shall issue and went by local area, with some places like Philly having total bans. |
|
|||
|
As far as I understand from reading case law about the Uniform Firearms Act is that sometime in the 20's (probably around 1928 when gun control was first being pressed at a national level) PA enacted laws that provided that local authorities (the sheriff except in Philadelphia county) may issue permits to carry a firearm in a vehicle or concealed about one's person. The applicant had to show some cause why they needed to carry a firearm and be of sound and fit character. The courts usually gave the local authority broad discretion in their decisions to issue or deny permits. (However I did once read a case from 1948 reversing a denial to a 60 year man of upstanding character who wanted to possess a firearm due to declining strength and because he lived alone.) There was a state constitutional challenge to this licensing scheme sometime in the late 70's but it was rejected by the PA Courts.
I believe the UFA was revised around 1988 making it harder for a local authority to deny a license. This was around the time that the NRA and a few think tanks came up with the modern "shall issue" model licensing scheme and managed to convince the Florida legislature to be first to adopt it. The current licensing scheme was adopted around 1995 when "shall issue" laws were sweeping more conservative states. From what I can recall, this was a major platform of the state republican party which helped them sweep elections in 1994. PA was one of the first states after Florida to adopt a very liberal "shall issue" licensing scheme. It departed from the model legislation by foregoing any type of required training before qualifying for a license. Also, from what I can tell, the permit has always been referred to as a "License to Carry a Firearm" in state statute, but for some reason is often referred to in case law as a "gun permit." This reason is probably mere simplicity. Gun permit is a lot easier to write over and over again then license to carry a firearm. I am not aware of the 1986 PA Supreme Court case referred to by one poster. I did a quick search and could find no reference to it. If someone knows of that case and can provide the parties or a citation it would be much appreciated. Last edited by archon; December 1st, 2008 at 02:35 PM. |
|
||||
|
I believe the PA permit referenced actually required the owner to "register" a hand gun and the permit was linked to that gun. Any other gun could be legally carried and owned, bought, sold... etc as long as the original gun "registered" was never transferred.
Think of it as a gun owners permit... as long as you had it you could own or carry any handgun you had, if you didn't have the gun anymore you had to get a new permit (stupid huh?)
__________________
The first vehicles normally on the scene of a crime are ambulances and police cruisers. If you are armed you have a chance to decide who gets transported in which vehicle, if you are not armed then that decision is made for you. Be prepared, because someone else already is and no one knows their intent except them. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I haven't had time, but I'd start with Lexisnexis to find the case. It's usually a better source for that type of info over just doing google. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does my prior criminal history prevent me from obtaining a LTCF or owning firearms? | gnbrotz | General | 39 | February 29th, 2012 09:00 AM |
| A little gun history | Kimba | General | 0 | November 24th, 2008 02:18 PM |
| A LITTLE GUN HISTORY | larrymeyer | General | 5 | May 16th, 2008 02:18 AM |
| A little gun history | phillyshooter | General | 0 | April 15th, 2008 12:56 PM |
| History in a Nutshell! | RocketFoot | General | 0 | January 16th, 2008 12:53 PM |

















Linear Mode

