|
|||||||
| General General firearm-related talk that does not fit into any of the other forums. |
| PAFOA Sponsors Businesses that provide financial and technical support to PAFOA. | PAFOA Shopping Partners A percentage of all sales made through these partner links goes to PAFOA. | |||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I just purchased a Bushmaster AR15 from my local Gander Mountain. I've purchased some other firearms there in the past, and generally been happy.
I brought the weapon home, took the bolt out, thinking to make sure there was no cosmoline, lubricate it, and generally get it ready to take to a range and zero. As I was wiping the parts of the bolt down, I noticed a LOT of black...not just some packing lubricant, but actual powder residue. I examined the extracter and firing pin, yup, more powder residue in this "new" firearm. No way to mistake it. The deposits weren't "baked on" as from extensive firing, but it's clear that the weapon isn't "new". Either it's pre-owned, or somebody decided to take it out to the range and "test" it. I could handle that if the retailor had been up front, but not only was it sold as "new", they didn't even clean out the weapon, for crying out loud. So, experienced firearm owners, suggestions, advice, etc? |
|
|
|||
|
Thanks. I was wondering if I should give the salesman at the store a chance to sort it out, or go straight to the management.
Funny thing is, I was merrilly wiping down the parts (from habits aqcuired a decade or so ago.."Parts dirty...clean parts...or many pushups happen") when the big breaker in my head went "Kachunk!" and it caught up with me that this was my "new" firearm. I haven't disassembled the extracter yet or run a patch through the barrel, so I there's still plenty of grime left to demonstrate the issue. |
|
||||
|
I know what you mean about the push ups good i hate them.........
anyway i would not clean any furhter. call or take it back is your best bet....... my fiance works for cabelas and i know that if someone at the store was responseable he and the manager of firearms would be on the out side looking in. |
|
|||
|
Yup. I quit the moment my brain caught up with my hands. Even saved the cleaning rags...pointless if the whole operation is crooked, but what the hell.
|
|
||||
|
A lot of those guns are test fired at the factory. I've seen some guns need a good scrubbing that were NIB.
P.S. - Many times it's the dealer who cleans them when they come in. Check under the charging handle. Got any marks from being cycled? That tends to happen after a few hundred or so. Last edited by Lycanthrope; March 17th, 2007 at 08:19 AM. |
|
|||
|
There was some grunge under the charging handle, but signs of noticible wear, there or on any of the other moving parts.
I thought about the possibility of test firing, but I'd never heard of the firearm not being cleaned before being shipped out. That's a new one to me. Have you heard of that happenning with Bushmaster in particular? |
|
||||
|
I've heard of it happening with Bushy and a couple of other manufacturers. As someone else said oftentimes it is the dealer who cleans them before they go on display. I'm not sure that I would be overly worried unless I saw something completely off the wall.
__________________
Bill USAF 1976 - 1986, NRA Patron, SASS #75267, Charter Member HCA |
|
|||
|
It is very normal for "new" guns straight from the maufacturer to be dirty. They are pressure tested and sometimes function-tested. I have seen some that were extremely dirty, probably from extended firing. Most customers don't see this because the dealer will clean them before selling. Large volume dealers, special ordered guns or a busy shop might keep the guns from being cleaned. If the gun doesn't exhibit obvious signs of wear, it is probably new. I try to clean every gun, new and used, going through my shop.
|
|
||||
|
I also would call it "normal" as long as there is no visible wear from repeated use. I have purchased NIB guns that also showed signs of firing, many even came with a shot target. Chock it up to factory test firing, a lot of residue would make me wonder though. Problems with it at the factory so it received most testing? I still think I would prefer a gun test fired at the factory for problems rather than receive it "virgin" and find the problems myself.
__________________
Guns are good. If you can't fry it you shouldn't eat it Loud pipes save lives Mom spelled backwards spells....mom "Please don't squeeze the Charmin." ~ Mr. Whipple |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Congress Passes NRA-backed "Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006" | doug | General | 5 | March 7th, 2009 11:29 PM |
| Met "Rock Star Ted Nugent" in Reading, PA and he asked us to relay a message for him. | dnar | General | 17 | March 24th, 2007 08:08 AM |
| House Committee Schedules Statewide Hearings on "Gun Violence" | doug | General | 4 | March 5th, 2007 12:03 PM |
| So where the heck is the "Firearms For Sale Specially Selected" section? | luckyned7 | General | 3 | February 21st, 2007 09:55 PM |
| The Official "Help the PAFOA become a registered Non-Profit Organization" fundraiser | danp | General | 131 | December 11th, 2006 12:02 AM |











Linear Mode

