|
|||||||
| Notices |
| General General firearm-related talk that does not fit into any of the other forums. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Department of the Interior Extends Deadline for Comments Regarding Right-to-Carry in National Parks and Wildlife Refuges Until August 8
Rather than closing the proscribed comments period as scheduled and moving toward finalizing this federal regulation, U.S. Senator Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) and U.S. Representative Raul Grijalva (D-Arizona), succeeded in delaying the implementation of the final rule by bullying the Department of the Interior (their respective congressional subcommittees have oversight of national parks) to extend the deadline for comments an additional 30 days! In a letter to Secretary Kempthorne, Senator Akaka and Representative Grijalva asked that the public comment period be extended, citing the recent decision in the District of Columbia v. Heller. The goal of their strategy is clear. Extending the public comment period amounts to a blatant and intentional stalling tactic; further pushing back resolution on this matter, possibly until after the election, into a new Administration. This needless extension will also allow opponents of carrying guns in national parks (like the Humane Society of the U.S. and the National Parks Conservation Association) to rally their troops to express their opposition to this commonsense proposal. While we disagree with the decision to extend the comments period on this issue, it is now more important than ever that we give the anti-gunners what they profess to want-additional comments. Gun owners, Right-to-Carry permit holders, and all Second Amendment supporters must deluge the Department of the Interior with comments in support of this proposal! The new deadline for submitting comments is August 8, 2008. Please submit your comments on-line at: http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspubli...0000648066022a
__________________
The National Guard, federally funded, with bases on federal land, using federally-owned weapons, vehicles, buildings and uniforms, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a "state" militia.
|
|
|
||||
|
Don't ever stop taking the time to do something that shows your support of your 2A rights. Even if it is a no brainer and you know it is going to pass. Take a moment and write to show your support.
The more of us that write in and respond, the more of a positive and strong image we portray to those in positions to make these laws in the first place. Maybe the next time they will stop and think before they should try and block handgun carry someplace else, remembering the strong turn out they got from us on this (Trivial?) matter. You can be sure the ANTI's are trying to make a big show of it. PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO WRITE. IT IS YOUR RIGHTS THAT YOUR SUPPORTING. THIS SHOULD BE WORTH A FEW MINUTES OF YOUR TIME. http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspubli...0000648066022a
__________________
The National Guard, federally funded, with bases on federal land, using federally-owned weapons, vehicles, buildings and uniforms, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a "state" militia.
Last edited by Mtbkski; July 11th, 2008 at 12:15 PM. Reason: web address added |
|
||||
|
Bad link.
Error Occurred We are sorry, but an error has occurred. This document is not open for comment. If you need further assistance, please contact the Help desk at 1-877-ERUL-HLP (1-877-378-5457). |
|
||||
|
Quote:
IF you can't find a contact point info to send a letter of support its on this thread here. http://www.pafoa.org/forum/national-...ark-carry.html |
|
||||
|
Bumped so more of you won't forget and can take a moment to write in and voice your opinions.
Please do your part to support your rights.
__________________
The National Guard, federally funded, with bases on federal land, using federally-owned weapons, vehicles, buildings and uniforms, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a "state" militia.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
It ain't happening, people. This is going to die in committee. All of the subcommittee save one has been given a grade of D or F by the NRA. |
|
|||
|
Did they close the commenting period? I already did it last week but I was going to send it to a friend of mine for him to fill out and the link no longer works.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Good News- National Park Carry | WhiteFeather | National | 44 | March 20th, 2009 07:48 AM |
| Senate May Consider Change In National Park Firearm Rules | wboggs | National | 9 | October 18th, 2008 11:22 AM |
| DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR - National Park Carry Update | larrymeyer | National | 8 | December 21st, 2007 12:59 PM |
| National Park Carry Update - 47 Senaters sign letter to DOI | WhiteFeather | National | 1 | December 20th, 2007 08:03 PM |
| National Park question | camery | Concealed & Open Carry | 22 | October 17th, 2007 07:34 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 PM.












Linear Mode

