Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association

Go Back   Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association Discussion Forum > Discussion > General

Notices

General General firearm-related talk that does not fit into any of the other forums.

PAFOA Sponsors Businesses that provide financial and technical support to PAFOA. PAFOA Shopping Partners A percentage of all sales made through these partner links goes to PAFOA.
Arms Dealer Logo

Arms Dealer — Free Firearm Classifieds, Gun Shop & Shooting Range Reviews

Arms Dealer is your one-stop shop for free firearm classifieds, gun shop & shooting range reviews.

Join today to start buying, selling and reviewing!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 12:21 PM
WarDog's Avatar
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location:
New Castle, Pennsylvania
(Lawrence County)
Age: 40
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 333
WarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond reputeWarDog has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to WarDog
Default Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

http://www.patriotactionnetwork.com/...-make-your-day

"Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.

Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun.

Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the
Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals. Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent.."

Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."

Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says.
Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state ... it's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit.
This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation.

" America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the b*******."

This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns.
Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.
Sounds reasonable to me! Non-gun owners require more police to protect them and this fee should go to paying for their defense!"
__________________
I't ain't braggin if you can do it !
Reply With Quote

Thanks for visiting our forum! If you ever plan to return you should consider quickly registering for a forum account, especially if you're in Pennsylvania. It's simple to do and best of all free. Once registered you'll be able to participate in our discussions and keep up to date on issues important to Pennsylvania firearm owners!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 12:32 PM
Yellowfin's Avatar
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
(Lancaster County)
Posts: 3,692
Rep Power: 688345
Yellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Yellowfin Send a message via Yahoo to Yellowfin
Default Re: Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

I completely agree. Pacifists mooch off of everyone else for protection then smear us for taking care of ourselves and try to take away our ability to do so.
__________________
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws--that's insane!" -- Penn Jillette

"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." -- Ted Nugent
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 12:36 PM
streaker69's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
127.0.0.1, Pennsylvania
(Lancaster County)
Posts: 10,685
Rep Power: 3166090
streaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond reputestreaker69 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowfin View Post
I completely agree. Pacifists mooch off of everyone else for protection then smear us for taking care of ourselves and try to take away our ability to do so.
Please don't lump all pacifists among the same ilk that would take rights away.

The Amish and Mennonites are not trying to take guns away from anyone.
__________________
Rules are written in the stone, break the rules,
and you get no bones, all you get is,
is ridicule, laughter, and a trip to the house of pain.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 12:45 PM
nycems22's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location:
w.wyoming, Pennsylvania
(Luzerne County)
Posts: 259
Rep Power: 2744
nycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond reputenycems22 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

that's awesome!
__________________
Μολὼν λαβέ
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 12:49 PM
Yellowfin's Avatar
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
(Lancaster County)
Posts: 3,692
Rep Power: 688345
Yellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond reputeYellowfin has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Yellowfin Send a message via Yahoo to Yellowfin
Default Re: Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

Quote:
Originally Posted by streaker69 View Post
Please don't lump all pacifists among the same ilk that would take rights away.

The Amish and Mennonites are not trying to take guns away from anyone.
Hmm...quite true. I suppose I should just say sheeple, but I was trying to capture the fact that the sheeple often do so on a false moralistic basis, which should be brought to their attention that it's in fact quite immoral.
__________________
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws--that's insane!" -- Penn Jillette

"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." -- Ted Nugent

Last edited by Yellowfin; July 18th, 2011 at 12:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 12:56 PM
zackattack784's Avatar
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location:
Eastern, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,867
Rep Power: 29302
zackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond reputezackattack784 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

This is an old article. Either way, I disagree with it. Nobody should be forced to exercise a right. Absolutely ridiculous.
__________________
I am not a lawyer and nothing I say should be construed as legal advice.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 01:01 PM
camper's Avatar
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location:
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
(Adams County)
Age: 4
Posts: 1,918
Rep Power: 147968
camper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond reputecamper has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

While I love the idea in principle because of who gets singled out, I hate the idea that the state is keeping books on and charging fines to people for any reason.

camper
__________________
It's the 2nd Amendment that protects all others
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 01:17 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location:
Bimmerville, Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County)
Posts: 1,517
Rep Power: 0
PaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond reputePaBimmerGuy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

Quote:
Originally Posted by zackattack784 View Post
This is an old article. Either way, I disagree with it. Nobody should be forced to exercise a right. Absolutely ridiculous.
some cantons in switzerland have compulsory voting. if you dont show up to vote they come to get you.

what bothers me is that is a de facto registration of gun owners. if you have a list of everyone who doesnt own a gun then if a person isnt on the list he must have a gun.

Last edited by PaBimmerGuy; July 18th, 2011 at 01:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 01:57 PM
bac0nfat's Avatar
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location:
New Britain Township, Pennsylvania
(Bucks County)
Age: 27
Posts: 2,863
Rep Power: 82856
bac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond reputebac0nfat has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

I don't think the bill was ever meant to pass, but rather make a political statement. Personally I would not support such a bill. Forcing people to own guns is just as bad as confiscating guns IMO. There is nothing in the second amendment that "mandates" gun ownership:

Quote:
Originally Posted by US Constitution
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
We have a right to free speech, but we also have a right to remain silent. Likewise, we have the right to arm ourselves, and the right not to. That's the whole idea behind America; individuals making their own decisions.

That being said, I would support a bill making all gun-related purchases tax-free and tax-deductible, as we are contributing to the sovereignty of the state with every purchase.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2011, 02:20 PM
ungawa's Avatar
Master Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Northampton County, Pennsylvania
(Northampton County)
Posts: 13,703
Rep Power: 2517897
ungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond reputeungawa has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Vermont, A tax for non firearm owners

Vermont is the only state that does not require a permit to carry a concealed weapon? That's news to me. Because that was not true yesterday.

How would one avoid registering and paying the tax? I guess you would have to provide evidence that you own a gun? Something that can be documented?

Big dumb nonsense.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Firearm's Owners Against Crime, Gun Bash!!!!! renegadephoenix General 114 April 9th, 2011 06:12 PM
The Kansas Firearm Owners Association Jackal General 25 October 19th, 2010 12:37 AM
Firearm Owners Against Crime- Biased BS!! Archiver Pennsylvania 43 May 12th, 2010 10:17 PM
Many in PA think you need a License to own a firearm. Even some firearm owners. B2Luv2Hunt Concealed & Open Carry 22 March 23rd, 2010 09:21 AM
Firearm Owners Against Crime...voting RugerNiner General 4 September 14th, 2008 01:40 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Marketing Services provided by MergeMedia.
Local gun shops | Local shooting ranges | Philadelphia Shooting Ranges | Philadelphia Gun Shops | Pittsburgh Shooting Ranges | Pittsburgh Gun Shops