|
|||||||
| General General firearm-related talk that does not fit into any of the other forums. |
| PAFOA Sponsors Businesses that provide financial and technical support to PAFOA. | PAFOA Shopping Partners A percentage of all sales made through these partner links goes to PAFOA. | |||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
Awesome!
Does the action "suck" from a purely functional standpoint, or is it about the ergonomics? |
|
||||
|
I guess I'm talking about the ergonomics, because I was really saying that they all suck in general. Although right now there's cosmo all over the chamber/bolt.
Anyway it turns out that this is looking like a fake, but as long as if can function well this won't bother me. |
|
||||
|
Please, define fake as it applies to this situation? I'm confused, because you stated it is a post war assembled sniper config. If you were told it was WW2 issued with original scope, and it wasn't then it would be fake. Genuine WW2 issued scoped Mosins (all original) can go for $800 or more. This one was put together after the war, probably with post war parts. It's a good looking piece, probably be a good shooter. If you have any, try light ball ammo, it'll be a little easier on your shoulder.
Last edited by nijwnfi; December 10th, 2007 at 12:40 PM. |
|
||||
|
One of the best ways to spot a "fake" (meaning someone took the time to mount the scope, rather than the Russies) is take a good hard look at the bolt. Please post a few closeups of the bolt, specifically at the handle. While its hard to define what consititues a fake, if its a hack job then its probably a "fake."
Fake or not, its a damn good looking rifle. And if memory serves correctly, Russian sniper rounds are of the light ball variety.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Gloria: "65 percent of the people murdered in the last 10 years were killed by hand guns" Archie Bunker: "would it make you feel better, little girl, if they was pushed outta windows?" http://www.moviewavs.com/TV_Shows/Al...he_Family.html |
|
||||
|
I barely get enough time to sleep during the week so please pardon me for my absences. Now as you guys said it's a fine rifle still, but going by the information PArifleman has supplied me with it's obviously a fake based on the comparison pics. There's absolutely no doubt about it. Worse case is now I have an awesome sniper repro shooter. Now I'll just have to cry over the M1 Garand that I just got from CMP.
|
|
||||
|
Nice! I do like to get my hand on one of them...
How clear is the scope? I've heard that some if those PE(russian copy of Zeiss scope I guess?) scope can be bit foggy after so many yeas...
__________________
The United States Constitution ©1787. All Rights Reserved. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RUSSIAN WW2 M. 91/30 SNIPER RIFLE | Willtallica | General | 31 | August 1st, 2008 06:57 PM |
| Super Sniper scopes? | spangineer | General | 13 | October 2nd, 2007 11:27 PM |
| This one will surprise most of you: Dr. Ruth was a trained sniper | ALS | General | 16 | March 8th, 2007 07:14 PM |
| "Liberal" approved Sniper Rifle | LorDiego01 | General | 6 | December 28th, 2006 12:47 PM |
| Springfield Sniper Rifle | Willtallica | General | 4 | November 12th, 2006 06:22 PM |
















And if memory serves correctly, Russian sniper rounds are of the light ball variety.






Linear Mode

