This is just a throwout in trying to figure out where some sense of authority might be derived.
Knowing the following to be true:
Quote:
|
[6106(a)] (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), any person who carries a firearm in any vehicle or any person who carries a firearm concealed on or about his person, except in his place of abode or fixed place of business, without a valid and lawfully issued license under this chapter commits a felony of the third degree.
|
Quote:
§6108. Carrying Firearms on Public Streets or Public Property in Philadelphia.
No person shall carry a firearm, rifle or shotgun at any time upon the public streets or upon any public property in a city of the first class unless:
(1) such person is licensed to carry a firearm; or
(2) such person is exempt from licensing under section 6106(b) of this title (relating to firearms not to be carried without a license)
|
Quote:
§6119. Violation Penalty.
Except as otherwise specifically provided, an offense under this subchapter constitutes a misdemeanor of the first degree. (Chgd. by L. 1989, Act 68(2), eff 2/5/90.)
|
If someone jumbled all that and thought that Philly + License required = felony 3d, or some similar jumble (must be concealed or whatever) perhaps someone could think it somehow falls under citizen arrest. Because people keep quoting Kopko and NOT where Kopko found its authority...I'm not sure where PA really stands on felony and non-felony citizen arrest.
Someone needs to cough up
Commonwealth v. Chermansky, 430 Pa. 170, 242 A.2d 237, 239 (Pa. 1968) which is where the court got the idea that felony citizen arrest is okay. I would like to know what they said.
I know this doesn't excuse any mentions of being police, except that a person can say they're policing...it's a fine line. It's like, a person is dressed in something you think police would wear, and they say they're policing, but you didn't ask them if they were a duly and lawfully ordained organization with authority granted by the state.
A person can ask you to do things just like a police officer, and you don't have to comply with either of them because they lack color of authority.
---
Quote:
|
Just as a side path off the main topic here....but 911 is for emergencies. The non-emergency number would be more appropriate. Just as the patron at OCB calling 911 was inappropriate, so too would this be. Sorry...just something of a personal pet peeve.
|
As for verification, I would definitely call 911. You can't exactly try and call the local police probably not knowing their number, and since you can't trust the potential policeman, you can't try calling 'their barracks'. You could try 1800GOOG411 and spend the time speaking the city and state, and then the probably name of the county police department or similar, and work from there, but that's supposing the potential officer doesn't make any moves of force upon you.
You don't think that's an emergency? I hear some people are robbed, beaten, and killed by fake officers. Dealing with government is always an emergency.