Quote:
Originally Posted by Pa. Patriot
BUT
PA wiretapping law applies only to places and conversations expected to be private.
The way I understand it, most conversations in most public places will have "no expectation of privacy".
|
i disagree. the case you quoted points out that the standard is, at least sometimes, the expectation that the conversation will not be electronically recorded rather than a general expectation of privacy:
Quote:
|
A trial court has held that a communication protected by the legislation is one in which there is an expectation that it will not be recorded by any electronic device, rather than one in which there is a general expectation of privacy. Thus, the fact that a participant may believe he will have to reveal the contents of a communication, or that other parties may repeat the contents, does not necessarily mean that he would have expected that it would be recorded, and it is the expectation that the communication would not be recorded that triggers the wiretapping law's protections. Pennsylvania v. McIvor, 670 A.2d 697 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1996), petition for appeal denied, 692 A.2d 564 (Pa. 1997).
|
this seems to me to pretty clearly state that it is an expectation of non-recording, rather than a general "expectation of privacy", that triggers this statute.
so, my non-lawyer guess would be that if there was no general expectation of privacy, you could record someone's voice as long as they knew you were doing so...even if they didn't actually agree to it. however, if they don't know you are recording their voice, you are violating the law.