Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleRedToyota
just out of curiosity, what is the requirement to have standing to actually act on this...
1. can any PA resident bring a suit against the sheriff?
2. do you have to be a resident of the county in question?
3. do you have to have had the sheriff take longer than 45 days to issue you your LTCF?
4. do you have to meet number 2 and then been charged for carrying without an LTCF after the 45 days, but before you actually got your LTCF?
thanks.
|
Standing can be tricky, and the courts are constantly "raising the bar" so fewer and fewer people can challenge government action. In the case of a permit, however, it is pretty straightforward. Anyone who applies for a permit and has to wait more than 45 days for a decision is personally aggrieved, and has standing to proceed.
In the right circumstances, one who is himself aggrieved may proceed on his own behalf, and on behalf of all the other people whose licenses are being unlawfully delayed.
There is a lot of new case law (since about 1997) that says official misconduct does not give rise to a
federal civil rights claim unless it is so egregious that it "shocks the conscience of the court." This is one way that conservative judges have limited civil rights actions.
Unfortunately, nobody knows what will or will not "shock the conscience of the court." (Really.)
We do know some things. For example, it is now settled that if one can prove that zoning officials are refusing to issue a permit to which an applicant is legally entitled, and they are doing so deliberately, with ulterior motive, and knowing they are violating the law, it does
not "shock the conscience of the court," and it is
not considered a federal civil rights violation. (Justice Alito helped create this law when he sat on the 3rd Circuit. But at least we don't have to worry about gays getting married.)
I therefore doubt one could collect any damages by reason of having to wait 55 instead of 45 days for issuance of a license. I do think that an injunction might issue requiring the Sheriff to obey the law, and ordering the County to pay counsel fees. This would particularly be the case if one could show a pattern of systematically delaying license applications affecting many people.
An alternative approach would be to appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of the involved county on "day 46." One could seek a writ of mandamus compelling the Sheriff to perform a non-discretionary duty in a timely manner. The duty is to either issue the permit or articulate why, under the specified statutory grounds, the permit should not issue, within 45 days of application.
There are probably other state law avenues of relief. The above are all that come immediately to mind.
My point is that going from one public official to another, with your hat in your hand, asking them to save you from their buddy in the office down the hall, will not often work. If you want public officials to obey the law, make them obey the law. It is lame, and almost always unproductive, to stand around asking why the government officials don't restrain themselves.