Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnes
I'll go ahead and say that my drive for self-preservation is every bit as important as someone's drive for same-sex relationships. So, me having a gun is every bit as much a choice for me as it is the choice of another person to engage in relations with a person of the same gender.
That being said, I think that both signs should be perfectly acceptable on private property, and both should be completely unacceptable on public property.
|
I have to agree.
I know folks will strongly disagree, but freedom of association and freedom of property, to me, mean one should be able to bar anyone from their property. Including people of ethnic/sexual/religious persuasion.
In so far as the original topic, I think Cramer would be fine for excluding gay people from his property, but to try and associate gays and OC'ers as some sort of mutant subhumans is counterproductive to his proported cause. I think he could disagree with gay people and OCers without being of a position that drives people away from our common cause.