[RoyJackson]

Originally Posted by Skuggi

I'm not liking that there is no amendment to fire for people with more rural property who may have a varmint problem or need to protect livestock. There have been cries about that, but I am not familiar enough with the area.

Lancaster City is pretty congested. I don't think there's any rural areas that would be included.

Now, York City is different...a ¼ mile outside of York is pretty rural.

I do think ChamberedRound has a good point about "slippery slopes" though. And, since other laws already cover reckless endangerment and such, I don't see this ordinance being necessary.