Quote:
Originally Posted by headcase
I wonder if they can ask for a mistrial based upon their attorney's incompetence? Last I checked, no county, or city of the first class, issued permits to carry concealed weapons.
So let me get this straight, their defense is going to be that, even in the face of caselaw to the contrary, because they feel OC is equivilent to terroristic threatening or disorderly conduct, their officer had every right to do what he did? Is that about right?
Hey TC, when this is over, remember who your true internet friends are...and that they may not have an AR they desperately need...   |
Did I take the interpretation right that because he was issued a "concealed carry permit" that he
HAD to carry concealed? WOW, I never knew.
Quote:
|
By way of further answer, at the time of the initial contact with Plaintiff, it was not known whether he was a business invitee and/or was legally and/or lawfully upon the aforesaid premises.
|
Isn't that a presumption or are LEO's suppose to treat us(citizens) as criminals?