View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old February 13th, 2009
Chazman321's Avatar
Chazman321 Chazman321 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
New Castle, Pennsylvania
(Lawrence County)
Age: 25
Posts: 1,350
Rep Power: 39
Chazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond reputeChazman321 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chazman321 Send a message via MSN to Chazman321 Send a message via Yahoo to Chazman321
Default Re: act 235 firearms module

http://www.mpoetc.state.pa.us/mpotrs...=1133&q=440289

The handgun course of fire for the police firearms course that all Waiver of training applicants must successfully complete with a minimum score of 75% and all police officers must successfully complete annually in order to satisfy mandatory in-service re-certification requirements will meet the following minimum standards:

A handgun course of fire must be considered a generally accepted police qualification course consisting of at least fifty (50) rounds of duty ammunition. A minimum of ten (10%) percent of the rounds must be fired at a distance of 25 yards or greater.

The course shall include stages to determine the applicant's or officers' overall proficiency; including, but not limited to marksmanship, safety, weapon operating procedures or tactical skills (i.e., use of cover, tactical reloading), with the weapon s/he will use in the performance of their duties. Requirements for distances of firing positions are: Stages no closer than one (1) yard and at least one stage of fire from the twenty-five (25) yard line or greater distance.

That's for police officers, I don't know how far off ACT 235 would be...

-Chaz
__________________
Who else can say they've fondled SlickNick's software, and abused her hardware?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LorDiego01 View Post
Or, you could always just use "liberal" four times in your sentence to complete a mega-ad-hominem-combo attack. :rolleyes:
A man in maternity pants is cruise control for cool. -Kaos

A61171
Reply With Quote