Thread: Auto-Workers may not get paid for not working?
View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old November 26th, 2008
Dredly's Avatar
Dredly Dredly is offline
Grand Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Saylorsburg, Pennsylvania
(Monroe County)
Posts: 3,557
Rep Power: 276
Dredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond reputeDredly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Auto-Workers may not get paid for not working?
Quote:
Originally Posted by normanvin View Post
No flames here.

By the same token why should they expect the common man to do anything other to buy their products. If businesses is slow they should tighten their belts the same way you and I have to.


When I say common man I do mean their customers. The same ones who ran out of gas waiting to get to the pumps in the 70's.
Here is the problem - you just nailed it right on the head!

If business is slow they should be ALLOWED to tighten their belts. They shouldn't be forced to pay millions a year to lazy shits that do nothing just because they are in a union. They also shouldn't be paying 30+ an hour to work in a no-skill assembly line job

Unions = Gov't regulated labor control which forces companies to not be in control of their employees. As long as Unions are around and in power like they are today then our production capacity will never increase
__________________
The first vehicles normally on the scene of a crime are ambulances and police cruisers. If you are armed you have a chance to decide who gets transported in which vehicle, if you are not armed then that decision is made for you.

Be prepared, because someone else already is and no one knows their intent except them.
Reply With Quote