[LittleRedToyota]

i'm on the same page as drew.

now that the carrying in state parks thing has been (mostly) fixed, the discretionary nature of LTCF revocations and denials should, imho, be next on the list. at a minimum, if the LTCF is reinstated (or issued after appeal), the sheriff's department should have to reimburse the LTCF holder for all costs involved in fighting the revocation/denial.

also, the character and reputation clause should be removed altogether so that the system is based on rule of law rather than opinion. if you meet an objective list of criteria, you can get an LTCF, if not, then not. simple as that.

we certainly have several cases where the character and reputation clause have been abused and law abiding citizens have been victimized by that abuse, so we should be able to come up with compelling reasons as to why.

another issue i would like to go after is the PSP sales database. i would like to see the language modified to specifically address the whole definition of a registry issue that the state supreme court used to get around the actual intent of the law. again we have examples of people's property being improperly confiscated as a result of the abuse of the sales database, so that should provide compelling reasons why.

whitefeather, i will at some point over the next week actually write up a position paper with the exact sections of the law i would like to see changed and with proposed wording...along with supporting arguments. (it will take a little time to do it right, so gimme a week or so.)