Thread: Shoot to kill or stop the threat?
View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old October 7th, 2008
Bmarshall91's Avatar
Bmarshall91 Bmarshall91 is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location:
New Castle, Pennsylvania
(Lawrence County)
Age: 31
Posts: 333
Rep Power: 92
Bmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond reputeBmarshall91 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Shoot to kill or stop the threat?
just for my own sanity, and i guess you could call it "peace of mind", i'd shoot to injure before i shot to kill. now, if the shot to injure did nothing to de-escalate the problem, then i would shoot to kill with no remorse. i think i would be too caught up in the moment though to think about ramifications... ("if i shot to kill could i get out of this in court?" would be the LAST THING on my mind in the moment.)
Reply With Quote