Thread: AR or Mini 14
View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old March 31st, 2007
RandomTask's Avatar
RandomTask RandomTask is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
State College-ish, Pennsylvania
(Centre County)
Age: 41
Posts: 1,046
Rep Power: 207
RandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond reputeRandomTask has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: AR or Mini 14

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent Ronin View Post
Headspace is the heart of the issue, the SAAMI spec for the .223 is tighter than the NATO round. This is common with military rounds, due to so many different nations/arsenals producing this common caliber, the military specs are more generous allowing for more variation in headspace dimentions. Therefore, it is certainly quite possible to have a 5.56 round to be too large for the .223 chamber causing a out-of-battery fire. Which can cause catastrophic damage to the rifle and its user.
I read elsewhere that using 5.56 ammo in a .223 chamber is not a problem as long as you stick with small (55gr or less) bullets. The larger bullets cause the headspace issue and increase the risk of catastrophe.
I have run 55gr 5.56 in my mini-14 without any hiccups.

Disclaimer: It is not a suggestion that you use 5.56 in a .223 chamber; I'm just reporting my experiences. Your mileage may vary.

BTW: I'm currently in the market for an AR-15, but I love the mini-14. I've been shooting 2" groups at 100yds (on the bench, iron sights, no sand bags) since I bought it in 1993. It's reliable and although the barrel gets hot, I think it can hold up to the rigors of severe plinking as well as post-Rodney King style urban unrest.

Last edited by RandomTask; March 31st, 2007 at 09:31 PM.
Reply With Quote