Quote:
Originally Posted by RocketFoot
Maybe we should start a Palin is a Babe thread! LOL
 |
OMG. I would totally hit that. I mean that with the most respect possible, but holy cow! I am sure that will be used to show how she is not really a conservative. [Sarcasm]She's really a loose hussy who has lots of babies and raises children to pop out kids too.[/Sarcasm]
So here's the thing. She had a child with Downs. It's funny that some evidence will be tossed away as not true while other non-evidence (left leaning blogs that suggested the baby was her daughter's) will be adhered to with a belief that borders on obsession. What is the big fucking deal? She had a child 4 months ago. I don't know what sort of doctors you went to, but every reputable OB I have ever spoken with and from my experience over the last year (my son is almost 6 months old now so it is real fresh in my mind) the doctor is completely unable to give a difinitave answer to exactly how far along a pregnancy is for a few reasons. First is that a woman can continue to have periods for up to three months after conception. Second children grow at different rates based on health of the mother and health of the child/fetus. Additionally the directionality of the ultrasound can make a child/fetus seem smaller or larger based on the position in the womb. Unless there is a fertility specialist involved it is very likely an "about" timeframe should be used.
Let's also look at the term "about five months" that you seem to take issue with. My son is about six months old. The fact that he is 12 days shy of six months could be a use for the term "about" six months old. Does that mean he's not my son since I don't give a 100% difinitive statement on the age of my son? Give it a break.
Let's break this "Trig is really the daughter's child" conspiracy. We will demand medical records for a child based on pictures of an overweight daughter (OMG she let her kid get fat what an evil bitch who has no right to be VP) from two years ago. Give it a rest.
Let's take a look at the firing. A cop uses a tazer on his 11 year old step-son (whether the step-son asked for it or not <--we could deconstruct that statement made by someone around here all day long) and committed several other crimes (I read that on the crawler last night on CNN as an extension of what he did, but don't have specifics). The governor says fire that trooper. Would it matter who this guy is if he wasn't married to Palin's sister? Nope. We would all be calling for the cop's head. He deserves to be fired over that. I have not seen his actions or crimes refuted at all other than the lame excuse given on this board of the 11 year old asking to be tazed. So the governer says fire him. The Commissioner of Public Safety says "No." He is allowing an clear threat to public safety to remain in uniform. He should be fired also. Can them both! No issue there.
Oh, but she has five children and one of them has special needs. Won't she be too busy to take care of her kids (not directed at you Stealth)? Will she be able to provide a good home for them? Will she be too distracted? That's the shit I am hearing on the news. WTF? Her husband stays home with the kids. How is that even an issue?