Quote:
Originally Posted by dgg9
The key distinction is between laws and rules. Laws should not be broken, but unless the PZ is a national park, CCW there is not against the law. If the PZ is a state park, then it's possible that CCW is against the law. If the PZ is neither, then any CCW ban is just some piss-ant rule that the PZ invented, and has no legal weight whatever. I'm gathering that the OP wants to know which of the 3 cases prevails.
|
Problem would be that if it is a policy set by the Zoo (is it privately owned?) you would be breaking their policy and be asked to leave the Zoo. While I think we have a right, I also think private property owners have the right to set policy that should be followed. You can't force one right down the throat of another who is exercising their right. If it is a city owned or national park I think the stupid regulations must be repealed, but until then follow the rules of private property owners and the laws of the land. Disregarding either is no way to change either.