View Single Post
  #44 (permalink)  
Old June 21st, 2008
Pector55's Avatar
Pector55 Pector55 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location:
Dover, Pennsylvania
(York County)
Age: 39
Posts: 1,512
Rep Power: 200
Pector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond reputePector55 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Assault Weapon Ban Bill

`(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

^^^^^Don't forget this line^^^^^


Does anyone else see the irony in these bills? Every time they pop up, a lot of people who have been putting off the purchase of an AK or AR, seem to step up their purchases of these firearms in order to get one or 5 or 10 before they can't. This creates a big marketing tool for manufacturers and retailers and people stock up. I wonder how many firearms were purchased due to this vs what would have been purchased if we were never worried about losing our right to do so? I would venture to guess that it would be at least 5 times more.

Last edited by Pector55; June 21st, 2008 at 01:21 PM.
Reply With Quote