View Single Post
  #234 (permalink)  
Old June 9th, 2008
ThoughtCriminal's Avatar
ThoughtCriminal ThoughtCriminal is offline
Super Member
PAFOA Silver Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location:
Sector 7, Pennsylvania
(Bucks County)
Posts: 591
Rep Power: 40
ThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond reputeThoughtCriminal has a reputation beyond repute
Default Great exchange from the DC v Heller case!

This exchange cracked me up when I read this:

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: What is -- what is reasonable about a total ban on possession?

MR. DELLINGER: What is reasonable about a total ban on possession is that it's a ban only an the possession of one kind of weapon, of handguns, that's been considered especially -- especially dangerous. The

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: So if you have a law that prohibits the possession of books, it's all right if you allow the possession of newspapers?
__________________
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death! " - Patrick Henry
Reply With Quote