View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old May 10th, 2008
Tomcat088 Tomcat088 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Lubbock, Texas
Age: 26
Posts: 1,590
Rep Power: 208
Tomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond reputeTomcat088 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Tomcat088 Send a message via Yahoo to Tomcat088
Default Re: .300 wsm...magnification for 200 - 400 yards?

Great choice in caliber kmrcstintn, lol, of course I could be a little biased since I'm currently building a .300 WSM long rifle. I shoot prairie dogs (from what I hear quite a bit smaller than ground hogs) with a .22 lr out to 200 yards with a cheap tasco 10x. 14x should be enough and the buckmasters have good enough glass that you should be able to resolve the ground hogs at those distances. I don't see why 14x should be a problem, it's mainly just a preference thing. Alot of people think that they more magnification than they actually do. If you can see and quarter a target with that magnification, you can take them out if your shooting skills are up to par. I think that you'd be better off spending the money on good ammunition, or getting into reloading if you don't already. The .300 WSM factory ammo is lacking a little bit, and you can definately get into reloading for what you'd spend to get a better scope thank your buckmaster. Shoot more and get better, and I assure you that most shooters equipment is better than their skills. Effective trigger time is what helps you get those hits, not more magnification. Best of luck to you.
Reply With Quote