View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old February 14th, 2007
TonyF TonyF is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County)
Posts: 3,651
Rep Power: 270
TonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond reputeTonyF has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: AR-15 for Home defense in Philly

Quote:
Originally Posted by danp View Post
Advisable? Probably not.
If the shooting was justifiable the weapon system / platform won't make a difference. The fact that handguns are significantly less effective than a long gun can easily be proven to a jury.

Quote:
Over-penetration may be an issue
One of the reasons LE agencies have switched from sub guns and SG's to AR15's is that the 5.56 cartridge was found to have much less penetration in typical building materials than handgun ammo yet it still penetrates body armor. This is even true of M193 FMJ ammo. It's not just conjecture and speculation, there is allot of hard data on this issue.

Quote:
plus it will "look" scary to the sheeple when you're in court.
On the surface this may be true but again, the argument in favor of the terminal effectiveness of the 5.56 can easily be made in court.
__________________
Tony
412.310.7838
http://www.fireinstitute.org

"... there's trained and untrained" (Denzel Washington -- Man on Fire)
Reply With Quote