View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old March 26th, 2008
brian's Avatar
brian brian is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
lebanon, Pennsylvania
(Lebanon County)
Age: 35
Posts: 2,047
Rep Power: 108
brian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond reputebrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Model 1903 "Springfield" 56k unfriendly

Quote:
Originally Posted by mercinarysniper View Post
My biggest question is if indeed this rifle is an overhaul, why does every part that I see match? I would imagine that during an overhaul, parts would be replaced without concern of manufacturer, just as long as they all worked.

I'm really not trying to start an argument with anyone, just trying to learn some history of this rifle, that, and I'm stubborn.

they were done after the war, after they had been declared obsolete.
more care was taken. there was no rush to get them back in service. and most times the only part replaced was the barrel.

the a3's originally had blued bolts as well. their smaller parts were often blued, though later in the war they were parked as well.

i've seen it on the net, but never in written print, that the punch prick mark in the center of the ordnance mark on the barrel is an indicator of an overhaul.
__________________
it's only metal, we can out think it....

Last edited by brian; March 26th, 2008 at 09:48 AM.
Reply With Quote