View Single Post
  #200 (permalink)  
Old March 20th, 2008
ChamberedRound's Avatar
ChamberedRound ChamberedRound is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Pennsylvania
(Berks County)
Age: 35
Posts: 4,043
Rep Power: 422
ChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond reputeChamberedRound has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Supreme Court Will Hear D.C. Guns Case

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjl127 View Post
What I'm concerned as this case setting a precedent for further regulation, since this was brought up on the oral argument transcript:

Page 77, lines 2 to 13.

Look it up.
While I agree that Gura should not have conceded this point, IMHO his backpedaling didn't state anything which doesn't already exist in federal law. His statements just re-affirm Miller, that reasonable restrictions are valid. I don't believe that these statements are going to provide any more justification to further regulate firearms than Miller already provides.
__________________
"[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
-James Madison, Federalist Papers, No. 46.

"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." [sic]
-John Quincy Adams

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
-Thomas Jefferson

Μολών λαβέ!
-King Leonidas
Reply With Quote