Quote:
Originally Posted by sgser
After listening to the questions asked, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Court were to hear a case to determine how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. They could probably settle that question to their own satisfaction.
I know the subtleties and nuances of legal language are too arcane for my untrained mind but after hearing some of the questions asked in Heller I can begin to understand how they arrived at their tortuous decision in Kelo.
I would be curious as to how the legally astute members of this forum would opine.
|
Kelo, was a decision that was decided by the 4 liberals and kennedy, liberals are socialists, socialists believe in social engineering, social engineering doesnt care about the individual....
since that decision the courts makeup still has the 4 socialists, the one guy in the middle Kennedy and the 4 Constitutionalists. I believe if we all side with McCain in 08, Ginsberg - who uses current european law in her decisions, and definitely JP stevens will be dead and need to be replaced. with mccain its possible to get 2 more justices who are conservative...swaying the balance to 6 individual rights justices, 1 middle guy and 2 socialists. Kelo could be overturned very easily, if judged that a person has a lawful right to property that they own, and ammendment 4 would protect that.... ammendment 5 was what was tested in KELO... But it could never be upheld vs Ammendent 4