View Single Post
  #110 (permalink)  
Old March 16th, 2008
rwilson452's Avatar
rwilson452 rwilson452 is offline
Platinum Supporters
PAFOA Platinum Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Elkland, Pennsylvania
(Tioga County)
Age: 65
Posts: 1,437
Rep Power: 33
rwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond reputerwilson452 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to rwilson452
Default Re: Supreme Court Will Hear D.C. Guns Case

I have been musing about the case and gazing into my crystal ball. It seems to me the way they are addressing this they don't want to address the bear part of the amendment. This would suggest to me they want a second bite of the apple. I suspect they intend to have two levels of scrutiny one to keep arms and one to bear arms. There can be no doubt that someone will equate bearing with keeping, so it will once again the 2nd will reach the high court.
Reply With Quote