View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old February 26th, 2008
Rule10b5's Avatar
Rule10b5 Rule10b5 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Landenberg, Pennsylvania
(Chester County)
Age: 34
Posts: 1,104
Rep Power: 68
Rule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond reputeRule10b5 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Powder River Precision XD Striker Safety Lever

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtkratzer View Post
Since there are so few shootings, and even fewer go to court, why should I be worried? If I've already said my gun isn't coming out of the holster unless it's going to be fired and that's only happening in a situation where my life is going to end or I'm going to be severely injured if I don't, I shouldn't have anything to worry about. The first issue is going to be whether or not my life was in danger and the shooting was justified. I won't even draw unless pulling the trigger is justified.
*sigh*

I've spent a ridiculous amount of time trying politely to explain why you're incorrect as matter of law and practice -- yet you continue to ignore the substance of my posts and repeat the oft-chanted and tired mantra that all that matters is whether the shooting is justified. You are wrong. I cannot say this any more plainly.

There are numerous factors that I've covered here and in other posts on the exact same issue. There are numerous articles by expert witnesses and other lawyers that take the same position I do. The fact that you continue to espouse an erroneous position makes the argument why anyone wanting to carry a concealed weapon should be required to take a training course that involves at least 20 hours of instruction on the law and the aftermath of a deadly shooting.

Why should YOU be worried?

You obviously aren't, and there is nothing I can say that will change your mind. Given your learned opinion on the matter, I'm sure that the detective on the case, the ADA, the judge, and the jury (if it gets to that point) are all going to ignore the cogent legal arguments that any sane prosecutor or plaintiff's attorney will advance in the event that you have to use your gun because you know, you're this guy, and you're really well-intentioned, and you don't think that the way that the law has been applied in the past to other cases is going to apply to you. That's cool, I'm familiar with that defense -- it's called the snowflake defense: It's predicated on the assumption that everyone is unique, special, and that his opinion on the way things should be counts just as much as anyone else's, and certainly more than the way the law actually is.

So don't you worry a bit. I'm sure your position is correct; I mean, hell, you probably know more about the law that I do, or any self-defense expert.
__________________
The material presented herein is for informational purposes only, is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up to date, does not constitute legal advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship. You should NOT act or rely on any information in this post or e-mail without seeking the advice of an attorney YOU have retained.

In plain English, while I am an attorney, I'm NOT your attorney, and I'm NOT giving you legal advice.

Last edited by Rule10b5; February 26th, 2008 at 09:37 AM.
Reply With Quote