View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old January 24th, 2008
knight0334's Avatar
knight0334 knight0334 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Brookville, Pennsylvania
(Jefferson County)
Age: 37
Posts: 5,907
Rep Power: 431
knight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond reputeknight0334 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to knight0334 Send a message via AIM to knight0334 Send a message via MSN to knight0334 Send a message via Yahoo to knight0334
Default Re: question about rifle classification

As mentioned above - it would not under the true definition. As for the false definition - not that I know of in the states that still have that goofy law. It required a detachable magazine, where as just about all tubular mags are fixed.

And since the federal law had sunset awhile back - it doesn't matter if it did or not.
__________________
Farewell, SFN. Rest in peace. :(
Reply With Quote